- #71
Amad27
- 412
- 1
Why not just avoid all confusion, and directly integrate form 0 to 1?anyway,ZaidAlyafey said:This is where a confusion happens. The inner $z$ is independent of the outer $z$ so to avoid that we always avoid such symbols. The inner $z$ is a dummy variable so we can choose any thing we want $x$ , $y$ or even $z$. So it is always preferable to use a symbol different than the boundary of integration for example $x$
$$\int^z_0 x^2\log(1-x)\,dx$$
$\psi(5/4), z = 1/4$
$\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n} = -\ln(1-x)$
Let $x = z^4$
$\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n(4n+1)} = -\int_{0}^{1} \ln(1-z^4) \,dz$
So we must figure out $\displaystyle -\int_{0}^{1} \ln(1-z^4) \,dz$ then add $\gamma$ to it. The integral is tough though.
The antiderivative is too intense to even look at. How would you evaluate the integral?
Out of curiosity, can you get a closed-form by using series. Maybe that could help. I was looking at the challenges section of the forum.
One of them is your logarithmic integral #3, which remains unsolved..
I just had a thought... if you don't mind, maybe we can try the integral, since no one has done it in two months or is that not allowed? Thanks.