- #771
bruha
- 385
- 495
Nice! The rings are clearly visible.bruha said:Hi, I attach my first (at least partly) succes of Saturn image
That’s great. Was this a 25 mm eyepiece?bruha said:Hi still one Saturn Gimp proc. image -probably better
chemisttree said:Detail near the interesting bits...
<snip>
You can just make out the collapsed northwestern wall, fully illuminated in the early morning light. At some point after the crater’s formation, this wall collapsed leaving an irregular edge to the crater and a tumble of fractured rock at its base.
looks goodbruha said:Hi and thanks.
I used USB HD camera bresser inserted to scope shaft instead of eyepiece.https://www.dalekohledy-puskohledy....g-s69NdTj3AJysw7CspDXuLiOxcIxgSsaAsAPEALw_wcB
Andy Resnick said:That *is* a cool region- here's a detailed view of the image I took last night:
bruha said:Hello, it looks really fantastic..
can I ask what is your "gear" equipment?
Andy Resnick said:Horsehead and Flame nebulae, 3h observing time
This shot taken with an SCT?Drakkith said:Very nice! Here's my narrowband image of the same target. I had a ton of problems with this shoot, and my results were not nearly as good as I was hoping.
But it's a very nice photo anyway, I'd say. Nice shades of red.Drakkith said:Here's my narrowband image of the same target. I had a ton of problems with this shoot, and my results were not nearly as good as I was hoping.
Very nice!Drakkith said:I consider this to be my best image.
This afocally with your 70mm inexpensive scope and the plossl it came with? And your camera phone/video? That’s impressive!DennisN said:Jupiter, 24 June 2020, with 2 bands visible.
Camera settings: ISO 200, 1/10 s exposure.
59 stacked photos processed with PIPP, AutoStakkert and finally Adobe Lightroom (where I could remove a lot of the aberration, and also increase contrast and decrease exposure, if I remember correctly).
The planet was just a yellow blob with atmospheric aberration in the telescope , but the postprocessing brought out at least some detail.
View attachment 265661
Thanks! Yes, a $35 scope and a $132 phone. And a lot of patience...chemisttree said:This afocally with your 70mm inexpensive scope and the plossl it came with? And your camera phone/video? That’s impressive!
This is a great start! Did you use the 25mm eyepiece? You need a fairly large exit pupil to get best results.bruha said:Hi,
I send 3 moon images by phone camera (Huawei Y 6) with phone eyepiece adapter , sharpened with GIMP. Anyway your postprocessed Jupiter looks nice .. (up to now I reached worse results with Jupiter..
Was this taken with <1 minute subs?Andy Resnick said: