- #106
Bipolarity
- 776
- 2
WBN, you seem to be extremely knowledgeable in physics for a rising sophomore. Is this the norm at Cornell? Or would you say you are in the upper quartile of your year, as far as physics is concerned? ![Stick Out Tongue :-p :-p]()
BiP
BiP
I understand, and I don't disagree. I appreciate your points.Arsenic&Lace said:Well, according to some who have seen both worlds (top 10 and less than that) the levels of rigor are not significantly different, especially in upper division classes), which was one of the more important points I was trying to make.
Thanks, I'll definitely have to try and focus more on research in the coming future regardless of if I stay at Cornell or go elsewhere. It would only look better in the face of grad school admissions, it would seem. Plus, your point is important to me for a bigger reason: more experience with research will tell me if I actually want to do physics research in grad school. Let's be honest, learning physics and taking physics courses is nothing like actual research and can be a bad representative of what is in store as far as grad school research goes. Getting acquainted with anything remotely close to such research would only help gauge if grad school is actually right for me, before I devote all that time.Arsenic&Lace said:Looking back on my last two years of undergrad, I'd say I wish I'd have spent less time on rigorous courses and more time on research and focusing myself into a narrow niche.
Does Somewhere Else U offer free cookiesArsenic&Lace said:Of course, if you want to be approach hardcore Landau or Feynman level theorist kinda skill you probably need to dig deeply into that stuff... but you can do that just fine in graduate school or junior/senior year, which you do whether you're at MIT or Somewhere Else U.
You're far more knowledgeable than me BiP, if I recall. As for my peers, I don't know too many but the ones whom I do know are very bright. I can't gauge where I stand amongst them myself, not at the moment anyways.Bipolarity said:WBN, you seem to be extremely knowledgeable in physics for a rising sophomore. Is this the norm at Cornell? Or would you say you are in the upper quartile of your year, as far as physics is concerned?
BiP
You're far more knowledgeable than me BiP, if I recall. As far as my peers at Cornell, I don't know too many but the ones I do know are very bright. I can't gauge where I stand amongst them myself, not at the moment anyways.
Bipolarity said:Lol WBN, I think you're just being modest... anyway do consider EE.
Perhaps Cornell offers a double major in EE and physics in which case you can have the best of both worlds. You could major in EE and take those physics course which specifically interest you. If you major in physics, I'm guessing there'll be some courses you don't find very interesting which you might be required to take?
What particularly fascinates you about physics? Its fundamental nature? The math? The people in the field? EE is very similar to physics; both are highly abstract, very mathematical, but EE people often get less attention than their physics counterparts. People still talk of famous physics personalities today; but in EE you won't see celebrities. Yet the CEOs of most tech companies tend to be engineers at heart, so if you have somewhat of an entrepreneurial spirit, go for EE. Engineering tends to be less fundamental at explaining the universe though, but it drives straight into the nail when it comes to explaining the technique of design which is itself also a very elegant science.
BiP
And what are your thoughts on the matter thus far? Any luck deciding or leaning towards one side more than the other?NATURE.M said:I'm facing similar issues when deciding to either follow my heart and pursue a BS in physics/mathematics, or to focus more primarily on obtaining a degree in applied mathematics, which would seem to offer better job prospects.
Oh certainly. Now if only they weren't so hard to get amiriteArsenic&Lace said:My impression is that if you are a physics major, your opportunities in finance are quite a bit better with a Phd.
The only thing is I'll have to sell my soul to the devil and work in a field I abhor. Ah well lol, you got to do what you got to do.Arsenic&Lace said:Haha, I suppose, but hell, I know two friends who are grad students at my school who got jobs in finance right out of the door, and the school I go to is nowhere near Harvard or Cornell or what have you.
WannabeNewton said:The only thing is I'll have to sell my soul to the devil and work in a field I abhor. Ah well lol, you got to do what you got to do.
Until I learn transfinite induction and finally prove that the long line is path connected and first countable but not second, I cannot go back. My self-esteem is at stake. Or you can construct the long line without using the axiom of choice and also prove the properties of the long line without using ordinals, in which case I will concede defeat and move onwards to CW complexes xP.micromass said:You sold your soul to devil already once you stopped doing topology![]()
WannabeNewton said:Until I learn transfinite induction and finally prove that the long line is path connected and first countable but not second, I cannot go back. My self-esteem is at stake. Or you can construct the long line without using the axiom of choice and also prove the properties of the long line without using ordinals in which case I will concede defeat and move onwards to CW complexes xP.
Lol I tried for like 5 days (i.e. I didn't forget about it an hour after starting it) and couldn't figure out how to do it without using ordinals. It's torturousmicromass said:I never said that ordinals and transfinite induction were necessary for the problem. They just make it a lot easierIt's still pretty difficult though.
WannabeNewton said:Lol I tried for like 5 days (i.e. I didn't forget about it an hour after starting it) and couldn't figure out how to do it without using ordinals. It's torturous.
Arsenic&Lace said:That, or Abstract Algebra.
WannabeNewton said:And what are your thoughts on the matter thus far? Any luck deciding or leaning towards one side more than the other?
Thanks for all the new responses. I'll see if Cornell has anything similar Mepris. Not sure I should be the one giving seduction advice for a living though![]()
Arsenic&Lace said:My impression is that if you are a physics major, your opportunities in finance are quite a bit better with a Phd.
WannabeNewton said:My original plan was to dual major in physics and math (with most of the emphasis being on pure math-analysis,topology, and differential geometry in particular) simply because I loved (and still love) mathematical physics but it is looking less and less practical by the second. Some people have recommended I try a physics and computer science or physics and engineering double major just to remain "practical" and "employable" in the eyes of potential employers but it seems like doing a comp sci or eng double major with physics would be quite a monumental task that would take away substantially from my self-studying of physics and mathematics (which is honestly the biggest source of joy in my life at the moment). I mean does employ-ability in the above sense really rely so much on an extra major in a practical field? Can one not just learn programming without all the extra theory (not that the theory isn't interesting-far from it but a normal person like myself can only focus on learning so much at a given time)?
Derp I like Stephen Hawkins and teh string theory of Beethoven's 5th symphony as recited by Michio Kaku. On the other hand there are some nice textbooks out there on non-trivial global causal structures in general relativity and quotient space-times with interesting topological properties, non-time orientable space-times, and closed time-like curves so it isn't exactly a far fetched theoretical area of study.micromass said:How do you know you really like theoretical physics? Theoretical physics is not just reading popsci books about wormholes and time travel.
WannabeNewton said:Some people have recommended I try a physics and computer science or physics and engineering double major just to remain "practical" and "employable" in the eyes of potential employers but it seems like doing a comp sci or eng double major with physics would be quite a monumental task that would take away substantially from my self-studying of physics and mathematics (which is honestly the biggest source of joy in my life at the moment). I mean does employ-ability in the above sense really rely so much on an extra major in a practical field? Can one not just learn programming without all the extra theory (not that the theory isn't interesting-far from it but a normal person like myself can only focus on learning so much at a given time)?
Mépris said:But most jobs in finance aren't for PhDs! I'm talking about the analyst jobs that people with any bachelor's degree (ranging from art history to zoology) can be hired for. For those jobs, where you went to school matters so much more than what your degree is in.
WannabeNewton said:My original plan was to dual major in physics and math
A physics / engineering double major would be a significant undertaking at Cornell for the simple reason that physics (I'm assuming you're a physics major, not an A&EP major) is in the College of Arts and Sciences while engineering degrees are offered by the College of Engineering. That the two colleges have somewhat orthogonal core requirements is going to make this a rather tough task. Comp sci will be less problematic in this regard because it lives in both colleges. It still won't be easy, and it most likely will add an extra year to your undergrad career.Some people have recommended I try a physics and computer science or physics and engineering double major just to remain "practical" and "employable" in the eyes of potential employers but it seems like doing a comp sci or eng double major with physics would be quite a monumental task that would take away substantially from my self-studying of physics and mathematics (which is honestly the biggest source of joy in my life at the moment).