- #176
rbj
- 2,227
- 10
kasse said:Dawkins wants people to start thinking for themselves and look for evidence. What's fanatic about that? What's dangerus?
i didn't say that it's either fanatic (from a scientific POV) nor dangerous (again from a scientific POV). i want you guys to stop trying to change the subject and weasel out of this. you keep repeating two falsehoods that are so easily disproved, even Dawkins would say you're silly.
Dawkins is an atheist. Dawkins definitely has an agenda to promote his way of thinking in such a way to displace theism (he not only promotes the virtues of atheism, he denigrates theism). not commenting on if that is bad or good. but it is what he does, particularly of late.
it is silly to deny that, at least some atheists (and some spokespersons for atheists), have focused agendas pushing the POV on others. that is clearly what they are writing about (at least in part). doesn't say that Dawkins is wrong about it or that he doesn't do science. but it's silly to deny that atheists, as a class of people, have no agenda. it's semantically silly.