Solving a 2.2kg Block Incline Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter GOPgabe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Incline
AI Thread Summary
A 2.2kg block slides down a 30-degree incline from a height of 10m, with a coefficient of friction of 0.1. The potential energy at the start is calculated as 215.82 J. The work done against friction needs to be considered when determining how high the block will ascend the second incline. The initial calculations suggest the block will reach a height of approximately 6.53m, but frictional losses indicate it won't return to the full height of 10m. A more accurate approach involves calculating kinetic energy at the bottom and then determining the ascent distance based on that value.
GOPgabe
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.2kg block slides down a planar incline. The incline makes an angle of thirty degrees with the horizontal and the block starts 10 m above ground. The coefficient of friction between the block and the incline is .1. The block reaches the bottom of the incline and then slides up an identical incline on the other side. To what vertical height will the block slide on the second incline? Ans. 7m

Homework Equations


P.E.= mgh
Ff=u mg cos (theta)


The Attempt at a Solution



The potential energy is =2.2*9.81*10=215.82

Here's where I'm a little unsure.
The work done by Ff is u mg cos(theta) * 20 ( the hypotenuse) *2, because you have to account for it up, right?

So 215-74.686=141.34

To account for height I think mgh works so 141.34/(2.2*9.81).

I get 6.53, not 7. Did I do this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GOPgabe said:
The potential energy is =2.2*9.81*10=215.82
So far so good. :approve:
Here's where I'm a little unsure.
The work done by Ff is u mg cos(theta) * 20 ( the hypotenuse) *2, because you have to account for it up, right?
Well, you do have to account for it going back up, yes. But the way you have done it, you are accounting for it going all the way back up, to reach a total height of 10 m (i.e. another distance of 20 m back up along the hypotenuse).

But you can be sure, that due to friction (and conservation of energy), that it's not going to make it that far back up. You can bet that the frictional losses will be greater when going down than back up, because the object doesn't travel as far on the way back up. (For a constant force like friction on a dry flat surface, W = \mathbf{F_f} \cdot \mathbf{s} [/tex]. But we don&#039;t know what <i><b>s</b></i> is yet, on the way back up.) <br /> <br /> I suggest breaking the problem up into two parts. Find the kinetic energy when it reaches the bottom. Using that interim value, then set up a new equation in terms of an unknown distance back up the incline. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":wink:" title="Wink :wink:" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=":wink:" />
 
Got it! Thanks!
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top