- #141
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,256
- 0
So when all of this has been ongoing, I have wondered the Idea of not "Speaking ill, of the dead", I agree, just that I am not the one raising the spectre, (That is whomever is continueing that persons words, and/or persons who followed {aided and abetted} that person) not to the best of my knowledge, and that is simply because it has never been 'cured'...sorta like my side of the story, almost in anger, now, cause of all of the time that this has been permitted to continue, in this society, without any resolve, or attempt at resolution, of anything...comes down to, if I have committed a crime, then arrest me, otherwise, you have to respond to me, you too have legal obligations, not just me...Oh yea, they just tried that...well, sorta...but I don't think I had committed any crime, (ended up appearing as I had not, as I was set free...so it was a cold wet night, in a wet sleeping bag, in a tent) if I had been a "wanted felon" or 'accused' of Anything, I would have been kept there, no question of that one, then again, had any of this been responded to, by anyone, who has a legal responsibility to society, then none of that would have occurred...humm talk about creating a story, by ignoring one in process...
So I had wanted to remain private, that cost me on the day of the judgement (Jan 26 2001) inasmuch as I had mentioned to a "Someone" that I might be mentioned as "Involved" in that case, and they found out the answer to that one before I did...seemed to be rather unhappy with me, as I then appeared as a liar, and unbeknownst to me...found out later that I hadn't been mentioned but recalled that I had mentioned that I had preferred the pathway of remaining a private citizen, soo this was good, hadn't known, or thought, that the Justices of the Supreme Court could have accomplished that, but they had, THANKS!
So then the next part befell the Government of Canada, legislative part inasmuch as, in not having made it public, the Justices had, responsibly, (Legally bound) not proffered any opinion upon the nature of the work, and it's affect in that case, at least not publicly, but the Attorney General needed to know, as did the responsibility of the Attorney General oblige the then Prime Minister, to know, as well, (required by law, Governance of Eminent Domain, the resolution to a Constitutional Challenge) so for me to have, simply, the ability to "Prove It" they were, and are, (To the best of my knowledge ) to act on behalf of the people(s) of Canada, and respond to me!
Why this is yet to happen, three years plus later, YIKES!...there oughta be a LAW...Oh wait, there IS!
Where?
So I had wanted to remain private, that cost me on the day of the judgement (Jan 26 2001) inasmuch as I had mentioned to a "Someone" that I might be mentioned as "Involved" in that case, and they found out the answer to that one before I did...seemed to be rather unhappy with me, as I then appeared as a liar, and unbeknownst to me...found out later that I hadn't been mentioned but recalled that I had mentioned that I had preferred the pathway of remaining a private citizen, soo this was good, hadn't known, or thought, that the Justices of the Supreme Court could have accomplished that, but they had, THANKS!
So then the next part befell the Government of Canada, legislative part inasmuch as, in not having made it public, the Justices had, responsibly, (Legally bound) not proffered any opinion upon the nature of the work, and it's affect in that case, at least not publicly, but the Attorney General needed to know, as did the responsibility of the Attorney General oblige the then Prime Minister, to know, as well, (required by law, Governance of Eminent Domain, the resolution to a Constitutional Challenge) so for me to have, simply, the ability to "Prove It" they were, and are, (To the best of my knowledge ) to act on behalf of the people(s) of Canada, and respond to me!
Why this is yet to happen, three years plus later, YIKES!...there oughta be a LAW...Oh wait, there IS!
Where?