- #5,426
- 19,714
- 25,693
Good luck!nuuskur said:Oh lord have mercy, I'm in love again. Infatuated at the very least..
Good luck!nuuskur said:Oh lord have mercy, I'm in love again. Infatuated at the very least..
Oh no! Now I'll have this one in mind the whole day ...WWGD said:Wasn't there a line in some song : "Stupid Cupid, stop picking on me"?
Borg said:Hmm, my first thought was this.
... and don't forget to bring a https://www.blumeideal.de/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/b160422aa3e9ae5c444acda3163659bd/1/2/12roterosen.png!WWGD said:As long as you don't say "Jehova".
Paraphrasing some sage advice from John Saffran...nuuskur said:Oh lord have mercy, I'm in love again. Infatuated at the very least..
And of risking getting arrested unless you do it the right way at the right time ;).strangerep said:Paraphrasing some sage advice from John Saffran...
Try to surreptitiously sniff the other person's underwear -- it's the only way to be sure... ☠
John Saffran actually did it in a TV experiment called "Race Relations".WWGD said:And of risking getting arrested unless you do it the right way at the right time ;).
A little too "Down Under" for me.strangerep said:John Saffran actually did it in a TV experiment called "Race Relations".
It's in the category of "I can't believe I'm watching this on FTA TV, but I do believe I'm about to wet myself laughing".
That's what they call it in Bohston.fresh_42 said:Maybe we should call it Quantum Foam instead.
So, if even MIT calls it so ...WWGD said:That's what they call it in Bohston.
Yes, they say it WITH an accent.fresh_42 said:So, if even MIT calls it so ...
Heh, I no longer respect superstition or cults of any kind. If superstition were true it would not need defence.skyshrimp said:[...] and I respect other peoples beliefs. [...] I was atheist.
Kenny said:There's a smell in here that will outlast religion.
strangerep said:Heh, I no longer respect superstition or cults of any kind.
It's OK to say that gods, angels, heaven and hell are superstitious claptrap and that organised religions are money grubbing power seeking scams. Just don't give any specific examples - that's where free speech ends.strangerep said:Heh, I no longer respect superstition or cults of any kind.
I dunno. I think you were Led into it.Borg said:I've been in a Zepplin mood all day. It's Nobody's Fault but Mine.
skyshrimp said:I'd really like to camp out in a country where I can view Aurora Borealis and thousands of stars. I'd like to see the faint image of the Milky Way with the naked eye.
I know the star. I have similar ones here. They belong to the LHR class!skyshrimp said:I go to work in the morning at 4:15am and one of the stars always catches my eye. It's brighter than the rest and seems to flash greens and reds.
What direction? And how far above the horizon (specifying distance above horizon in units of "fists held out directly in front of you at arm's length," will suffice just fine)?skyshrimp said:I go to work in the morning at 4:15am and one of the stars always catches my eye. It's brighter than the rest and seems to flash greens and reds. Maybe it's a planet? Idk... All the other stars don't flash, yet this one consistently flashes every morning.
I can only see way less than 100 stars due to light pollution in London, UK.
Another mystery is a faint, dense cluster of about six stars in a rectangular formation.
Maybe I could snap a pic on my iPhone so you can see one morning.
I'd really like to camp out in a country where I can view Aurora Borealis and thousands of stars. I'd like to see the faint image of the Milky Way with the naked eye.
... which is why I guessed LHR star(t)s.collinsmark said:(I'm assuming your location is somewhere around London, UK.)
I have seen this with bright stars near the horizon. Some explanations:skyshrimp said:I go to work in the morning at 4:15am and one of the stars always catches my eye. It's brighter than the rest and seems to flash greens and reds. Maybe it's a planet? Idk... All the other stars don't flash, yet this one consistently flashes every morning.
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com...ect-could-i-have-seen-at-late-june-on-the-skyeven on a seemingly clear night there can be a layer of turbulent air above you that will diffract the light from the sources and produce unsteady images. This is usually worse closer to the horizon as well
Edit: Isnt this what the gambler's fallacy is about?Eclair_de_XII said:"A geometric distribution can be used to describe a gambler at a slot machine with a poor understanding of probability. It describes a gambler who obstinately believes that the chances of winning become slightly greater each time they pour money into the machine."
Then I wrote this thought down and figured that this analogy wouldn't work unless the gambler had infinite money. And if this were the case, nobody need worry about their gambling addiction. At this point, the novelty is lost because the addiction is kind of the crux of the analogy.