What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

In summary, the conversation consists of various discussions about documentaries, the acquisition of National Geographic by Fox, a funny manual translation, cutting sandwiches, a question about the proof of the infinitude of primes, and a realization about the similarity between PF and PDG symbols. The conversation also touches on multitasking and the uniqueness of the number two as a prime number.
  • #6,231
etotheipi said:
?:)
I didn't think it was that bad. Still, a waste of sacred bacon.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #6,232
Still waiting to see whether NK's Kim Jong Un is dead or alive.
 
  • #6,233
Idiot sitting right ne t to me in park when there are plenty of empty benches within short distance.
 
  • #6,234
I want to grow my own food but I can’t find bacon seeds.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes WWGD and Keith_McClary
  • #6,235
gmax137 said:
I want to grow my own food but I can’t find bacon seeds.
They are easier to find in Germany. They are hidden in our walls:
1589926983215.png
 
  • Love
Likes nuuskur
  • #6,236
Too bad we don't have a playground forum. I have found a machine which eats the simplest of all non trivial Lie algebras and spits out the gauge groups of the standard model.
 
  • #6,237
Ended up exhausted on a duscussion on whether 1=0.999... in the Surreals , Hyperreals and other models. I'm pretty far from having a full understanding of the topic.
 
  • #6,238
WWGD said:
Ended up exhausted on a discussion on whether 1=0.999... in the Surreals , Hyperreals and other models. I'm pretty far from having a full understanding of the topic.
It is a crackpot discussion. There is no ambiguity as soon as notation has been properly defined. It's a debate for hobby calculators.

I just found this - looks a bit like the Scottish west coast:

middle_math.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Borg, etotheipi, DrGreg and 1 other person
  • #6,239
fresh_42 said:
It is a crackpot discussion. There is no ambiguity as soon as notation has been properly defined. It's a debate for hobby calculators.

I just found this - looks a bit like the Scottish west coast:

View attachment 263255
No, there are actual issues if you work with Hyperreals or Surreals without the Archimedean property. True that it is settled within the standard Reals.
 
  • #6,240
Seems kind of strange these people who describe themselves as _passionate_ something: Chess players, Mathematicians, etc. Is this a separate sexual thing or do they have " feelings" towards these activities, etc?
 
  • #6,241
fresh_42 said:
I just found this - looks a bit like the Scottish west coast:

View attachment 263255
You know how maps like that in fantasy novels never look quite plausible? I strongly suspected I'd enjoy Juliet E McKenna's books the instant I picked one up, because the maps of her continents had long narrow triangular cutouts, so you could have cut them out and constructed a partial sphere (or polyhedral approximation to one, anyway).

This version seems to have the maps crossing the cutouts, but the version in the books doesn't.
 
  • #6,242
WWGD said:
Seems kind of strange these people who describe themselves as _passionate_ something: Chess players, Mathematicians, etc. Is this a separate sexual thing or do they have " feelings" towards these activities, etc?

I'm passionate about partial fraction decompositions
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes collinsmark, WWGD and BillTre
  • #6,243
etotheipi said:
I'm passionate about partial fraction decompositions
No details, please, unless you're a gorgeous woman.
 
  • Haha
Likes etotheipi
  • #6,244
WWGD said:
No details, please, unless [...].
Reminds me of this

20130402.gif

(Source: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-04-02)

[Edit: click the source link for a more readable version of the comic that avoids PF's auto-resizing.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #6,245
The sentences that finally put a nail in the coffin on doubts about the usefulness of commas. " How do you know Einstein* ? "Me: I never said I knew Einstein .

*Instead of " How do you know, Einstein?"
 
  • #6,248
WWGD said:
Aftermath=? After Math=...? Good luck!
Just hopeing I'll still have some math skills in the after math. Thanks for the "good luck"
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, ProfuselyQuarky, fresh_42 and 1 other person
  • #6,250
Ibix said:
You, I take it? I hope you're on the mend. Those staple things are amazing - they come out and barely leave a mark.
They're coming out this coming Monday
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD, ProfuselyQuarky and Ibix
  • #6,251
Undergrad logic: non-constructive proof, instructor (I) can't give counter-examples to false claims in proof, therefore proof is correct. :oldgrumpy:
 
  • #6,252
Given it is made in China, it works astonishingly long.
 
  • #6,253
Staples are out and I'm feeling great!
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD, Klystron, BillTre and 2 others
  • #6,254
I had BBQ ribs, fries and sweet pickled tomatoes for lunch.

I think I'll order Chinese for dinner. I'll get the House Special chow mein, the spicy king prawns and a pancake roll.
 
  • #6,255
I have a new metal in my collection; titanium. Except it's in my head, not a jar.
 
  • #6,256
I was told that my neighbor killed a big black-snake trying to get his baby chicks. I cried since I've caught a large one every summer for years; thinking it was my pet he killed. But I heard this sound in my chicken coop and low and behold MY Snake!
IMG_3248.JPG

This big boy is 2 meters+ in length.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes atyy, nuuskur and BillTre
  • #6,257
I thought this was mildly interesting to look at :wink:

1591486472312.png
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD, nuuskur and Ibix
  • #6,258
"bi" means "two/twice"
"semi" means "half"
Why are biannual and semiannual synonyms in English?
 
  • #6,259
mfb said:
"bi" means "two/twice"
"semi" means "half"
Why are biannual and semiannual synonyms in English?
Because we have "biennial" to mean "once every two years", and we wouldn't want to confuse anything.
 
  • #6,260
mfb said:
Why are biannual and semiannual synonyms in English?
Why does "flammable" mean the same thing as "inflammable"?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #6,261
DrGreg said:
Why does "flammable" mean the same thing as "inflammable"?
Aren't there serious efforts to deprecate "inflammable" and just use "flammable" and "non-flammable", because this is a genuine safety issue?
 
  • #6,262
Ibix said:
Aren't there serious efforts to deprecate "inflammable" and just use "flammable" and "non-flammable", because this is a genuine safety issue?
From TIL:
hmmm27 said:
army : "say again", because "repeat" is an artillery command.
Do they say "conflagration" in the army?
 
  • Haha
Likes Klystron
  • #6,263
Keith_McClary said:
From TIL:
Do they say "conflagration" in the army?
I imagine they do. Probably not so much over the radio in combat, which was what I was referring to.
 
Last edited:
  • #6,264
DrGreg said:
Why does "flammable" mean the same thing as "inflammable"?
Both are used...irregardless.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Keith_McClary
  • #6,265
Supposedly, thinking is calorie-intensive. Wonder if you could lose weight by eating the same amount of calories ( holding all else constant) and thinking more.
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
26
Replies
878
Views
18K
  • General Discussion
77
Replies
3K
Views
133K
Replies
21
Views
923
  • General Discussion
115
Replies
4K
Views
200K
  • General Discussion
65
Replies
2K
Views
147K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
601
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
992
  • Sticky
  • General Discussion
Replies
0
Views
594
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top