Which system to apply conservation of momentum to?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of conservation of angular momentum in a scenario involving a person on a swing. It is clarified that the person-swing system should be considered as a whole for conservation, as the angular momentum is conserved when the person stands up. The necessary angular acceleration is provided by the static friction force between the swing and the person, ensuring the net torque remains zero. There is a debate about the role of static friction, with concerns raised about the person being thrown off the swing if not holding on. The key takeaway is that the person-swing system is the appropriate choice for analyzing angular momentum conservation.
chris25
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A person stands on the seat of a swing and squats down, so that the distance between their center of mass (CM) and the swing’s pivot is L0. As the swing gets to the lowest point, the speed of their CM is V. At this moment, they quickly stand up, and thus decrease the distance from their CM to the swing’s pivot to L'. Immediately after they finish standing up, their CM speed is v0.
Relevant Equations
Comes from F=ma 2020b
Conservation of Angular Momentum
For this problem I was very confused whether conservation of angular momentum should be applied to the person, the swing or the person-swing system. It seems to me that there is no net torque on any of the three systems I listed above. However, it seems that the angular momentums of the three separates systems I listed cannot all be conserved simultaneously. Which system should I use, and for the systems wthere angular momentum is not conserved, where does the net torque come from? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 10.56.57 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 10.56.57 PM.png
    31.9 KB · Views: 119
Physics news on Phys.org
If you take as your system the person + the swing, then the angular momentum of this system is conserved. As the person stands up, his/her/zes CM at its new radius must acquire a smaller angular velocity for the system's two components to continue moving as one. The torque that provides the needed angular acceleration opposite to the angular velocity comes from the force of static friction exerted by the swing on the person's soles. Of course an equal and opposite torque is exerted by the soles on the swing and the net torque on the two-component system is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes chris25 and Lnewqban
kuruman said:
The torque that provides the needed angular acceleration opposite to the angular velocity comes from the force of static friction exerted by the swing on the person's soles
Not the soles, I think. Unless holding on to the ropes either side, the swinger would be thrown forwards off the seat.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top