Why scientifically, do we need procreation as a species?

  • Thread starter Saint
  • Start date
In summary, Moonbear believes that sex should not be limited to "only between husband and wife." He also believes that rape should be accepted under certain circumstances.
  • #71
We only have to disagree on the political subforum, we're safe here.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #72
tribdog said:
I'm not a sycophant, I'm Aquarius

LOL! Hi, I'm a Scorpio!

http://love.astrology.com/features/astrology/lovematch/scorpioaquarius.html

:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #73
Oh ok. Usually people who disagree with me in one area just decide that I'm wrong everywhere else, so that's an unusual position.
 
  • #74
Moonbear said:
LOL! Hi, I'm a Scorpio!

http://love.astrology.com/features/astrology/lovematch/scorpioaquarius.html

:smile:


Basically, you two just would never work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #75
franznietzsche said:
Basically, you two just would never work.

Oh, I thought it said we'd get along wonderfully...once we beat each other to death! :smile:
 
  • #76
Some people (men) think that sexual pleasure has to do with the Physical Size of the genital organ. The longer the better!
To men, may be this is true.
But to women, sex is not only limited to physiology, but encompasses mentality too,
they need romantic ambience before having sex.

Another question is,
do you think sex is limited to "the penetration of penis into vagina?"
Is it ok to do something more than that? To find other "inlets" ?
 
  • #77
Moonbear said:
Oh, I thought it said we'd get along wonderfully...
No that would be http://love.astrology.com/features/astrology/lovematch/leoscorpio.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #78
franznietzsche said:
Oh ok. Usually people who disagree with me in one area just decide that I'm wrong everywhere else

No franz, we don't. I've got to disagree with you on that.
 
  • #79
Saint said:
Some people (men) think that sexual pleasure has to do with the Physical Size of the genital organ. The longer the better!
To men, may be this is true.
But to women, sex is not only limited to physiology, but encompasses mentality too,
they need romantic ambience before having sex.
[redneck] What are you a F**? I bet you're just small [/redneck]
 
  • #80
Actually i think We would make the best match. Us[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #81
franznietzsche said:
Basically, you two just would never work.
I can change. Really I can.
 
  • #82
I know that the black has the most tremendous size of it,
the asians are generally inferior in size.
 
  • #83
Smurf said:
No that would be http://love.astrology.com/features/astrology/lovematch/leoscorpio.html

LOL! Leo's sound kind of needy. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #84
Saint said:
Another question is,
do you think sex is limited to "the penetration of penis into vagina?"
Is it ok to do something more than that? To find other "inlets" ?

Finally :smile:...a real gem...I've been waiting so long. :approve:
 
  • #85
Smurf said:
[redneck] What are you a F**? I bet you're just small [/redneck]


[irish]
99 bottle of whiskey on the wall...
Ohh, look at the...wit on her...
98 bottles of whiskey on the wall..
[/irish]
 
  • #86
Moonbear said:
LOL! Leo's sound kind of needy. :smile:

:mad: oh yeah well Scorpios sound kind of controlly
 
  • #87
just answer the question straightforwardly.
serius question!

Can sex be defined as something more than "sexual organ" ?
 
  • #88
tribdog said:
I can change. Really I can.

Yep, that's what it said, once we beat each other to death, we'll both mellow each other out...but where's the fun in being mellow? :biggrin:
 
  • #89
Moonbear said:
LOL! Leo's sound kind of needy. :smile:

I'm not needy, I'm addicted!
 
  • #90
My personal definition is that if a person climaxes, it is sex of one sort of another.
 
  • #91
franznietzsche said:
I'm not needy, I'm addicted!
Yeah! You tell her Franz!
 
  • #92
Smurf said:
My personal definition is that if a person climaxes, it is sex of one sort of another.


That reminds me...

[annoying voice]
THIS ONE TIME, AT HER HOUSE...
[/annoying voice]
 
  • #93
franznietzsche said:
That reminds me...

[annoying voice]
THIS ONE TIME, AT HER HOUSE...
[/annoying voice]

I thought it was a band camp, but I could be wrong. :confused:
 
  • #94
JasonRox said:
I thought it was a band camp, but I could be wrong. :confused:


That was the reference yes...
 
  • #95
Saint said:
Most youngsters have masterbation, which gives them a certain level of sexual pleasure. So, it is naturally they will feel curious to Explore sex with opposite sex. As long as they know how to avoid pregnancy and STD, do you think it is ok for them to ignore Virginity ?
I agree but most adults don't. They just say don't do it until your older but they don't know how hard it is to not want to. It's hard because you want to try it but you don't want to get and STD or pregnant.

Moonbear said:
We only need it once we've had it. It's a lot easier to not need it when you don't know what you're missing.
NOt really. It's hard not to do it because you don't know what you are missing. Everyone everywhere is talking about it (we even talk about it in some classes) and it's hard because you want to know what you are missing.

Saint said:
Some people (men) think that sexual pleasure has to do with the Physical Size of the genital organ. The longer the better!
To men, may be this is true.
But to women, sex is not only limited to physiology, but encompasses mentality too,
they need romantic ambience before having sex.

Another question is,
do you think sex is limited to "the penetration of penis into vagina?"
Yes and no. Yes if you are talking about weather or not it determines if you are a virgin or not. No beacuse you could do other things (oral sex) to get the same pleasure. Oral sex is not really "sex" but you still can get the same feelings without having "sex."
 
Last edited:
  • #96
Using condom can reduce men's pleasure,
what alternative we have?
 
  • #97
Saint said:
Using condom can reduce men's pleasure,
what alternative we have?

Masturbation. No condom, no sex, unless it's with your wife for the purpose of procreation.
 
  • #98
The survey shows that, in america, most youngsters will feel shy if they are asked whether they have sexual intercourse experience and the answer is No,
thus, they are forced to get involved in sex as early as possible to avoid shame.

True?
 
  • #99
Saint said:
The survey shows that, in america, most youngsters will feel shy if they are asked whether they have sexual intercourse experience and the answer is No,
thus, they are forced to get involved in sex as early as possible to avoid shame.

True?
It depends on who you are. There are some people that think that they have to do it to be "cool" but most people I know don't. Usually the people that call themselves "pimps" think that they have to do it. Most people just want to do it to see what it's like.
 
Last edited:
  • #100
Saint said:
The survey shows that, in america, most youngsters will feel shy if they are asked whether they have sexual intercourse experience and the answer is No,
thus, they are forced to get involved in sex as early as possible to avoid shame.

True?

No, they do what youngsters have always done; they lie about it and say they did when they didn't.
 
  • #101
Shay10825 said:

It depends on who you are. There are some people that think that they have to do it to be "cool" but most people I know don't. Usually the people that call themselves "pimps" think that they have to do it. Most people just want to do it to see what it's like.

This must explain why Saint said "most", the keyword.
 
  • #102
Shay10825 said:



NOt really. It's hard not to do it because you don't know what you are missing. Everyone everywhere is talking about it (we even talk about it in some classes) and it's hard because you want to know what you are missing.


No. That can be hard yes. BUt it will be much harder once you know what you are missing. Much.
 
  • #103
if virginity is not important, then there is no taboo about sex, right?

Do you think parents have the right to control their children (17<age<21) NOT to have sex?
 
  • #104
I don't think Parents have any rights over their children, I think children should be educated by the community and no one person(s) should be given ownership or controll over them.
 
  • #105
Smurf said:
I don't think Parents have any rights over their children, I think children should be educated by the community and no one person(s) should be given ownership or controll over them.

Yeah...let's see the community staying up all night or changing your baby's diapers.
 

Similar threads

Medical Evolution of people within a generation?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Why do we consider Neanderthals a different species than humans?
Replies
20
Views
2K
Why were wolves and dogs considered separate species until recently?
Replies
16
Views
4K
Night On Earth: Uncovering the Infrared Spectrum of Animals
Replies
14
Views
3K
Can we receive monozygotic (identical) twins in apes?
Replies
1
Views
799
How many alleles per gene the human species have today?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Usefulness of predicting species population
Replies
2
Views
1K
What fraction of genes do we share with relatives and with other species?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Are we byproduct of cell's survival scheme?
Replies
16
Views
3K
Why Does Species Stratification Occur in Biology?
Replies
21
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top