Collection of Science Jokes P2

[fresh_42]

Did we have this already?

 

[DrClaude]

Did we have this already?

Yes: #260

 

[fresh_42]

Yes: #260

I was afraid so. Problem is, it is so hard to search in those forums when there is basically no text. Otherwise I would have done.

 

[davenn]

Love this one !

 

[Mark44]

Love this one !

View attachment 227112

Picture b) explains the Oreo-geny of mountain building.

 

[Mark44]

View attachment 226645

But hey. At least he got perfect on the pattern shape identifying IQ test.

He should have gotten full credit. The picture starts off with
$\text{If } \lim_{x \to 8} \frac 1 {x - 8} = \infty \dots$
Since this is false, any statement you have in the conclusion (the part after "then") results in an implication that is true.

 

[fresh_42]

 

[mfb]

Fixed: $$\text{If } \lim_{x \to 8} \frac 1 {(x - 8)(x - 8)} = \infty \dots$$

 

[Psinter]

He should have gotten full credit. The picture starts off with
$\text{If } \lim_{x \to 8} \frac 1 {x - 8} = \infty \dots$
Since this is false, any statement you have in the conclusion (the part after "then") results in an implication that is true.

True. Two sided limit does not exist there. I knew before posting, but then I was like: "Meh. It's just a meme."

 

[davenn]

 

[hyunxu]

That's really difficult to look at. It's so clearly a spiral, even once you've worked out it isn't.

Try holding your device perpendicular to you.

 

[Demystifier]

View attachment 227180

This black hole violates the no-hair theorem.

 

[Demystifier]

Interview for a job in machine learning:
Interviewer: What is 5+7?
Candidate: 6.
Interviewer: No, it's 12.
Candidate: 17.
Interviewer: No, it's 12.
Candidate: 9.
Interviewer: No, it's 12.
Candidate: 14.
Interviewer: No, it's 12.
Candidate: 11.
Interviewer: No, it's 12.
Candidate: 12.
Interviewer: Congratulations, you got the job.

 

[fresh_42]

A little bit of self-criticism.

 

[Stavros Kiri]

When you use a circular argument, but you are unable to see where exactly your logical error is.
View attachment 224696

I do see two circles (by eliminating the illusion) ...
[Thus it's two "circular arguments", not one ...]

 

[Stuck In a Loop]

Question 7:
Is Schrodinger's cat _____?

(A) Alive
(B) Dead

 

[mfb]

Yes it is.

 

[Ibix]

Question 7:
Is Schrodinger's cat _____?

(A) Alive
(B) Dead

Mew

 

[DennisN]

View attachment 227180

Hilarious! Located in Canis Major, I presume?

 

[fresh_42]

Hilarious! Located in Canis Major, I presume?

Just its center BH.

 

[DennisN]

Just its center BH.

I had a software idea I regretfully never have implemented.
The idea was that the software would be an alternative recycle bin, called "the black hole".
When the user would drop a file onto the black hole icon, the black hole software would compress the file, encrypt it and move the file to a random place on the hard drive (without notifying the user where it went).
Totally useless, but I've programmed useless things before. :)

 

[DennisN]

 

[DennisN]

 

[davenn]

Uh huh !

 

[DrGreg]

It's tempting to think of particles as little marbles. But look more closely and you'll soon lose your marbles.Paraphrased from Brahic & Webb (27 June 2018), "How to think about… Particles", New Scientist.

 

[jack action]

 

[davenn]

 

[Ibix]

View attachment 227694

There used to be a whole list of these somewhere. It included stuff like "An object in motion will remain in motion at constant velocity until instantaneously retarded by a sufficiently massive object - typically an anvil".

 

[davenn]

There used to be a whole list of these somewhere. It included stuff like "An object in motion will remain in motion at constant velocity until instantaneously retarded by a sufficiently massive object - typically an anvil".

here's one list …..

 

[Psinter]

Source: https://imgur.com/gallery/vBsDUI5

Reminded me of the thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/dx-before-the-f-x-in-integrals.950465/

For what is worth, I remember that my professor of General Physics I had a weird way of doing math. The steps he took while he was talking were very different to what we were used to see in our math classes. I remember that once class was over I told a peer: "Did you see how he made that derivation? Weird. I didn't know what he was doing until he was over." He told me something along the lines: "Me neither. I was baffled."

 

[Ibix]

Try holding your device perpendicular to you.

Selfie taken while I tried this:

 

[Stavros Kiri]

Selfie taken why I tried this:
View attachment 227834

While [or better after] you tried that you mean.
OK, Now rotate twice and take square root of that! ...
You see it now? ...

 

[Ibix]

While [or better after] you tried that you mean.

It was indeed meant to say "while I tried that". Thanks - corrected. My eyes must still have been spinning...

 

[Stavros Kiri]

It was indeed meant to say "while I tried that". Thanks - corrected. My eyes must still have been spinning...

So is my brain! Wait? What?

 

[Psinter]

Parenting?