- #211
Oldman too
- 260
- 492
Still hoping for a clear sky here. As a consolation the ISS cameras are showing the show, with a few good cosmic ray hits from time to time.
That's a great view tooIn the meantime:Oldman too said:Still hoping for a clear sky here. As a consolation the ISS cameras are showing the show, with a few good cosmic ray hits from time to time.
Interestingly enough, the South Atlantic Anomaly is a favorite on the https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/ESRS/HDEV/ site. When the ISS passes through that area at night, (like it just did) the cameras really light up from the radiation, especially during strong solar activity. Great article by the way!Stavros Kiri said:The local magnetic field weakening (in certain area and magnitude) is also connected to some pole shifting/movement ... (the article explains it and the connection).
Thanks for pointing that out. Amazing. I used to have an app when the Earth camera ISS feature was active. I saw all kinds of amazing things back then and I wish I knew about the South Atlantic Anomaly back then to see the results live, in real time that is ...Oldman too said:Interestingly enough, the South Atlantic Anomaly is a favorite on the https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/ESRS/HDEV/ site. When the ISS passes through that area at night, (like it just did) the cameras really light up from the radiation, especially during strong solar activity. Great article by the way!
They still have at least two Cams active, usually a Nadir view but they cycle to other views also. If you keep an eye on the ISS tracker you can get a good idea of when the timing is right for a SAA pass, the "watching now" count is an indicator of a good pass coming up also.Stavros Kiri said:I used to have an app when the Earth camera ISS feature was active.
Thanks for that valuable info about ISS cams etc. . I need to find the time to update my apps/devices and ISS interest (I used to be more of a fan than now). I recall using the "watching now" feature and it even had an alarm alert for good passes etc.Oldman too said:They still have at least two Cams active, usually a Nadir view but they cycle to other views also. If you keep an eye on the ISS tracker you can get a good idea of when the timing is right for a SAA pass, the "watching now" count is an indicator of a good pass coming up also.
https://www.n2yo.com/space-station/ and https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/ESRS/HDEV/ both work well although other sites carry the feeds also. unfortunately it's not like before IBM bought up ustream and you could "chat" with Kit while he was working the cams at ISS Mission control. He was a great "tour guide" and would pan and zoom the cams if you asked, that was an awesome feature and I miss it.
By the way, thanks for posting the Solar activity info, much appreciated.
Very true ...sophiecentaur said:. . . . .and when you think that the Earth subtends a very small arc to intercept this stuff and that it's going out in all other directions too during high solar activity.
Making it a bit easier for you guys here on this extra post (cf. previous quoted one above etc. ...) :Stavros Kiri said:Very true ...
News: 1) Although humans are to blame for much of the ozone layer's depletion, observations of a type of aurora known as an isolated proton aurora have revealed a cause of ozone depletion that comes from space: Charged particles in plasma belched out by solar flares and coronal mass ejections also keep gnawing at the ozone layer. (see/based on article on space.com ...)
https://www.space.com/auroras-blast-hole-ozone-layer
2) Solar partial eclipse for Europe, today Tue 25 Oct, 2022 ... (e.g. see Monday's & Tue's spaceweather.com edition etc.)
https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=24&month=10&year=2022
3) ... and while the Sun (posted today Mon) just swallowed two comets [over the weekend ...] ... (see same source as 2) ...)
I don't know what the Sun's capture cross section is but, to me, that indicates there must be a lot of comets out there.Stavros Kiri said:3) ... and while the Sun (posted today Mon) just swallowed two comets [over the weekend ...] ... (see same source as 2) ...)
True. And also indicates that the Sun is a really good focus/center/spot for/of Gravitational attraction ... (etc.).sophiecentaur said:I don't know what the Sun's capture cross section is but, to me, that indicates there must be a lot of comets out there.
Up to a point but you have to remember that every massive object will attract stuff but it will be in orbit (like us) - not plunging in. Most 'visiting' objects like comets will be in a non-colliding orbit. The actual distance from the Sun that will involve capture of a very high speed object (arriving from the Kuiper belt, say) will not be vastly greater than the actual radius of the star, I suggest. There will be a distance (perihelion) at which some comets will start to disintegrate irreversibly and a lot of it could end up merging with the Sun. The rest will carry on approximately on the original orbit but not be captured. Next time round, there's a chance that it will collide.Stavros Kiri said:And also indicates that the Sun is a really good focus/center/spot for/of Gravitational attraction .
Absolutely. I totally agree. And you got the Mechanics right. It's just that more massive objects (as a function of the radius[, or the radius considered as just a cross-section involved patameter ...]) would make a stronger & better pole of attraction and/or disintegration (especially after multiple visits, that could eventually tear appart smaller and/or less solid or massive objects, especially like comets ...). Even Jupiter & Saturn (in our Solar System) are such "massive poles of attraction", although far smaller and less massive than the Sun, because of their relative sizes etc. compared to their neighboring planets etc. (e.g. Like Mars & Earth ... – lucky us! ; the Sun, Jupiter & Saturn take more of that asteroid & comet traffic [attracted more to them etc.], acting as a good Gravitational Shield for us etc., in most cases, depending of course on the comet's or asteroid's path & initial conditions of the corresponding mechanics problem ...). But in any case, yes, comets (and asteroids) do hit planets too! ... [And, theoretically, it could happen (though in rare cases) to any planet too, no matter how small or massive, depending again on the mechanics of the problem/path/initial conditions (e.g. for direction & velocity etc.) ... ].sophiecentaur said:Up to a point but you have to remember that every massive object will attract stuff but it will be in orbit (like us) - not plunging in. Most 'visiting' objects like comets will be in a non-colliding orbit. The actual distance from the Sun that will involve capture of a very high speed object (arriving from the Kuiper belt, say) will not be vastly greater than the actual radius of the star, I suggest. There will be a distance (perihelion) at which some comets will start to disintegrate irreversibly and a lot of it could end up merging with the Sun. The rest will carry on approximately on the original orbit but not be captured. Next time round, there's a chance that it will collide.
|
|
|
|
Wow! Sounds great!George Jones said:Last night I saw lots of "curtains" in the sky from my inside my city of 80,000 at 54N.