Collection of Science Jokes P2

In summary: Usually it's been commentated as being 'real'. Actually the joke dates back to the 30's and whether it's real or not cannot be said anymore.
  • #1,296
DennisN said:
Please note that the use of [itex] \pi , \sqrt{2}[/itex] or [itex]e[/itex] in any argument automatically makes it irrational.
I can't count the number of irrational arguments out there.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude, nuuskur, Ibix and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,297
DrGreg said:
I can't count the number of irrational arguments out there.
How many reals could Cantor count if Cantor could count reals?

Not great, but "countables" doesn't scan...
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #1,298
fresh_42 said:
First ever high resolution image of an exoplanet!
TrES-2 = Kepler 1-b
View attachment 248763
I thought I saw stars in the picture, but my screen was dusty :(
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Keith_McClary and Klystron
  • #1,299
jbriggs444 said:
For any real time process, it is complex.

For a while, dialing an unassigned MIT phone number produced the message "I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is imaginary. Please multiply by i and dial again."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, collinsmark, DrClaude and 5 others
  • #1,300
Vanadium 50 said:
For a while, dialing an unassigned MIT phone number produced the message "I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is imaginary. Please multiply by i and dial again."
I is on the 4 key on a phone keypad. So dial *4 after or 4* before?
 
  • #1,301
Ibix said:
I is on the 4 key on a phone keypad. So dial *4 after or 4* before?
Isn't * complex conjugation?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, DennisN, nuuskur and 1 other person
  • #1,302
If the original number is imaginary with a positive imaginary component then taking the complex conjugation and multiplying by i will make it real and positive, but multiplying it with the complex conjugate of i will work as well.

i*##\cdot##[number] and [number]*##\cdot##i are both fine.
 
  • #1,303
My IQ cannot be measured on the real number line. I'm just too complex!
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, Stavros Kiri, BillTre and 5 others
  • #1,304
iQ
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, BillTre, Drakkith and 3 others
  • #1,305
Drakkith said:
My IQ cannot be measured on the real number line. I'm just too complex!
Does that mean your irrational?
or imaginary?
 
Last edited:
  • #1,306
BillTre said:
Does that mean your irrational?
Since the Q in IQ stands for quotient, I think all IQs are rational by definition. But he could be completely imaginary.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #1,307
@Ibix
Just edited my response.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #1,308
Ibix said:
Since the Q in IQ stands for quotient, I think all IQs are rational by definition. But he could be completely imaginary.

IQ = Imaginary Quotient? Psh! Get real!
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #1,309
Drakkith said:
IQ = Imaginary Quotient? Psh! Get real!
I am real. You said you weren't.

(Now we have an argument. Can anyone think how to get a modulus into this?)
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and BillTre
  • #1,310
All wrong. It is an element of a ##Q-##algebra. It is generated by
$$
\{\,IQ , ABQ,BBQ,Q\#,Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,QB,QED,QLD,QM,QFT,QSO,QPR\,\}
$$
 
  • #1,311
fresh_42 said:
All wrong. It is an element of a ##Q-##algebra. It is generated by
$$
\{\,IQ , ABQ,BBQ,Q\#,Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,QB,QED,QLD,QM,QFT,QSO,QPR\,\}
$$
It's what you wait in when your Lasik doctor has three patients ahead of you.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and BillTre
  • #1,312
DrClaude said:
Isn't * complex conjugation?
Not for a mathematician.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #1,313
Experimental physicist: I understand ##x\gg 1##, but what does ##x\rightarrow\infty## mean?
Mathematical physicist: I understand ##x\rightarrow\infty##, but what does ##x\gg 1## mean?
Practical theoretical physicist: I understand both, but what's the difference?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, mfb, Wrichik Basu and 1 other person
  • #1,315
BillTre said:
Does that mean your irrational?
or imaginary?
I don't know about @Drakkith , but my number of friends [itex]f[/itex] can be written as [itex]f = a + bi[/itex], where [itex]a[/itex] is my number of real friends and [itex]b[/itex] my number of imaginary friends. As long as [itex]a > b[/itex], I consider the situation acceptable. I sometimes get into an argument with my friends. It's usually resolved as [itex]arctan (b/a)[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits, fresh_42, Drakkith and 2 others
  • #1,316
a>b
Your arguments are so limited.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #1,317
Matter.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes 256bits, Klystron, collinsmark and 5 others
  • #1,318
Screen Shot 2019-09-10 at 9.48.21 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes atyy, 256bits, DennisN and 6 others
  • #1,319
48725074887_b6262cae8a_z.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, jack action, Drakkith and 1 other person
  • #1,320
As long as the nose is pointing down they are not going to space today attack anyone.
 
  • #1,321
mfb said:
As long as the nose is pointing down they are not going to space today attack anyone.

Ah yes, the classic Up Goer Five! Remeber, if parts start to fall off in the wrong order, you will also not be going to space today.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,322
http://wpcomics.washingtonpost.com/client/wpc/tmrkt/ is a favorite of mine.
Wasn't sure whether to post here or in the science books thread. :oldwink:

Dr.Mel1.gif


Dr.Mel2.gif
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier, DennisN, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #1,323
Carbohydrates: We are infested with hydroxides.
Biologists: OH!
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #1,324
What was the star rating for the book about stars?
I heard its ratings were stellar.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, nuuskur and Borg
  • #1,325
Quantum Mechanics by Dr. Mel:

Caution, if you put it back on the shelf, it changes places with other books.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #1,326
1568823255855.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, Keith_McClary and nuuskur
  • #1,327
If it barks and walks like a dog then is it a setter?
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN
  • #1,328
Ibix said:
If it barks and walks like a dog then is it a setter?
Yes. And here is why we call those retrievers:
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, nuuskur and Borg
  • #1,329
fresh_42 said:
Yes. And here is why we call those retrievers:
View attachment 249808
A demonstration of the Banach-Tarski paradox?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, nuuskur and DrClaude
  • #1,330
The old monk though quite busy with other work still takes his turn walking into town to buy groceries not available within the monastery for the sick and infirm. The path is long but walking gives time to reflect. A donkey cart passes him, the drover calling out a friendly greeting in response to his silent wave. Sunlight reflecting off a wheel catches the monk's eye and he pictures the wheel's rotation in relation to the road, drawing a cycloid in his mind as the cart bounces away.

Just the shape Brother Carpenter requires to smooth the action of the mill, he thinks. The gear teeth should merge not unlike the rim of a wheel touches the surface of the road each rotation, a circle marking out the shape of the sprockets.

Entering the town market the monk selects brown onions carefully inspecting for rot, then green leeks and two heads of garlic with intact firm bulbs. Finally he enters the butcher shop whose owner greets him fondly. The monks had provided clear panes from their glass works for the butcher to display his wares in return for soups bones and the odd meat cut to serve in the infirmary.

Happy to be of service to such a learned man the butcher directs the monk's attention to the beef displayed on two shelves behind glass. Gesturing grandly the butcher asks,"Will that be Choice cut, Brother Mersenne, or Prime?".
 
  • Like
Likes atyy

Similar threads

Replies
412
Views
24K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top