Get Vaccinated Against the Covid Delta Variant

In summary: Delta variant, a Coronavirus strain first detected in India, is now officially designated as a variant of concern by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This designation is given to variants shown to be more transmissible than the original strain, which can cause more severe disease and potentially reduce the effectiveness of treatments or vaccines. As a result, the CDC is urging people who have not yet been vaccinated against COVID-19 to do so now. The Delta variant looks like it might be up to 60 percent more infectious than other variants of COVID-19, and as a result, the CDC is concerned that it could lead to more widespread and severe infections. However, both vaccine versions currently available are still effective against Delta-infect
  • #421
Astronuc said:
Data from Florida Department of Health
Cumulative deaths and positive cases due to SARS-Cov-2

Code:
           Aug 6-12, 2021      Sep 9-16, 2021
Age Group Deaths  Pos Cases   Deaths  Pos Cases
Under 16     10     312934       17     441765
16 - 29     179     677531      307     779829
30 - 39     451     494749      694     580192
40 - 49    1240     437144     1857     509193
50 - 59    3097     411251     4276     472537
60 - 64    2919     160322     3730     184794
65+       32870     381619    37891     439205

Total     40766    2877214    48772    3409165

Just over 8000 deaths alone between August 9 and September 16 (mostly Delta variant and some Mu). Numbers increasing in all age groups.
Hospitalizations are not reported.

https://www.local10.com/news/florida/2021/09/10/florida-covid-latest-data-report/
According to the Florida Hospital Association, 12,262 patients were admitted with COVID across the state on Thursday, that is 12,262 persons were hospitalized. The number seems to be decreasing.
That's a pretty good trick considering that today is September 13
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #422
Long term trends in Florida. New reported cases has definitely dropped. The dates highlighted are random.

1631580354383.png
1631580412012.png
 
  • #423
Ivan Seeking said:
That's a pretty good trick considering that today is September 13
Corrected the dates for September 3-9, as of last Thursday. Still a little over 8000 in one month, or rather 4 weeks/28 days.
 
  • #424
Astronuc said:
Corrected the dates for September 3-9, as of last Thursday. Still a little over 8000 in one month, or rather 4 weeks/28 days.
Yep, they've been averaging about 350 / day over 7 days for the last couple of weeks.

Living in Florida has been running between 4 and 10x more deadly per capita due to Covid, than living in California.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Informative
Likes Evo and bhobba
  • #425
Twitter thread: Jeremy Farrar, Director of the Wellcome Trust, interviewed by Kai Kupferschmidt on the transition to endemicity
"But what level of disease and death is deemed acceptable and thus what “endemic” looks like is going to differ from society to society. Farrar has been calling for an honest debate about this: “I think all countries are going to have to have this debate.”"
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes bhobba, russ_watters, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #426
Ivan Seeking said:
The dates highlighted are random.
Oddly, they did the dates every 79 days from 8 March 2020.
 
  • #427
I was looking at the situation in Texas, and I got a confusing picture regarding the demographics.

https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83
Texas September 10, 58,332 fatalities
Code:
Age Group Deaths
   <1        10
 1 - 9       16
10 - 19      48
20 - 29     395
30 - 39    1278
40 - 49    3434
50 - 59    7106
60 - 64    5615
65 - 69    7017
70 - 74    7668
75 - 79    7446 
80+       18299

I thought something was amiss, but in the confirmed (positive) cases, the text explains, "Case demographics are based on completed case investigations. Completed case investigations represent approximately 3.2% of all confirmed cases in the state of Texas."
Texas reports 3,198,035 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 617,123 probable cases. So the demographics don't mean much with respect to the age groups.
 

Attachments

  • Texas COVID-19 Fatalities.png
    Texas COVID-19 Fatalities.png
    19.2 KB · Views: 67
  • Texas COVID-19 Confirmed Cases.png
    Texas COVID-19 Confirmed Cases.png
    19 KB · Views: 68
  • #428
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes bhobba, pinball1970 and Astronuc
  • #429
atyy said:
Twitter thread: Jeremy Farrar, Director of the Wellcome Trust, interviewed by Kai Kupferschmidt on the transition to endemicity
"But what level of disease and death is deemed acceptable and thus what “endemic” looks like is going to differ from society to society. Farrar has been calling for an honest debate about this: “I think all countries are going to have to have this debate.”"
The UK is going give the vaccine to some children in an effort to deal current Delta levels
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57888429
Lock down pre summer we were at 2000 cases per day with about 30 deaths per day
Now its 35,000 and 200 deaths but is not climbing quickly
Acceptable will be? Between 30-50 deaths per day? That represents 12-17,000 deaths per year for the UK, similar to seasonal flu?
 
  • #430
pinball1970 said:
The UK is going give the vaccine to some children in an effort to deal current Delta levels
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57888429
Lock down pre summer we were at 2000 cases per day with about 30 deaths per day
Now its 35,000 and 200 deaths but is not climbing quickly
Cheer up. With almost 3x the population, you are doing far better than the State of Florida which has been averaging 350 deaths a day; and with peaks of over a thousand deaths a day.

In Alabama, if you call an ambulance because you're having a stroke or a heart attack, you might not see them for 4 hours.
 
  • Wow
Likes Evo and pinball1970
  • #431
Ivan Seeking said:
Cheer up. With almost 3x the population, you are doing far better than the State of Florida which has been averaging 350 deaths a day; and with peaks of over a thousand deaths a day.

In Alabama, if you call an ambulance because you're having a stroke or a heart attack, you might not see them for 4 hours.
I read Astronaucs updates too. So Mu, Delta, aging population and more conservative so possibly Vaccine hesitant population?
The paper from @atyy or @Ygggdrasil from the RS said that targeting the vulnerable in terms of Vaccine may not be as effective as vaccinating 'mixers' as they are passing it around. The paper was very dense so I could only get through the conclusion.
Apologies i will come back and edit this post as I am in transit.
 
  • #432
Ivan Seeking said:
State of Florida which has been averaging 350 deaths a day;
Florida has an estimated (2019) population of 21.48 million, but maybe higher now.

In contrast, in the month of September, NY State has averaged about 31 deaths per day due to COVID-19. NY State population is ~19.45 million (2019).
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #433
Astronuc said:
Florida has an estimated (2019) population of 21.48 million, but maybe higher now.

In contrast, in the month of September, NY State has averaged about 31 deaths per day due to COVID-19. NY State population is ~19.45 million (2019).
And that's Vaccine uptake? The fatalities?
 
  • #434
pinball1970 said:
And that's Vaccine uptake? The fatalities?
I haven't seen numbers of fatalities by vaccinated and unvaccinated, but only comments like 90+% are unvaccinated.

New York state reports about 61.8% of total population fully vaccinated, which includes 73.4% of population of ages 18+ (18 and older). https://covid19vaccine.health.ny.gov/covid-19-vaccine-tracker
Some counties have higher rates of vaccination.
NY State Covid cases - https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Map?:embed=yes&:toolbar=no&:tabs=n#/views/NYS-COVID19-Tracker/NYSDOHCOVID-19Tracker-Fatalities

In Florida - Total population (age 12 and older) is 19,119,043, with a vaccination rate of 69% as of September 9.
http://ww11.doh.state.fl.us/comm/_p..._archive/covid19-data/covid19_data_latest.pdf (subject to change/update on Friday or Saturday, for the previous week ending each Thursday).

Florida population: All ages 21,975,117 (2021), vaccinated (12 and older) 13,281,666, or 69% of the population.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/florida-covid-cases.html
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/new-york-covid-cases.html
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
  • #435
Astronuc said:
I haven't seen numbers of fatalities by vaccinated and unvaccinated, but only comments like 90+% are unvaccinated.
Between April 1 and September 9 there were 13637 fatalities. Of those 12239 had underlying diseases with most being diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, kidney disease and obesity. 21 were pregnant women. 84% were not vaccinated. However during those months 84%.
about corresponds to the percent of the unvaccinated Thai population. So with almost 90% of fatalities with serious underlying diseases you could conclude that being vaccinated did not provide protection in the 16% of vaccinated fatalities. https://www.thaipbsworld.com/over-84-of-thailands-covid-fatalities-had-not-been-vaccinated/
 
  • #436
morrobay said:
So with almost 90% of fatalities with serious underlying diseases you could conclude that being vaccinated did not provide protection in the 16% of vaccinated fatalities.
This assumes that the characteristics of the vaccinated population are the same as the characteristics of the unvaccinated population (e.g. age). Most countries prioritize vaccination of older individuals, who are more vulnerable to death to COVID-19 than younger individuals. If older individuals have a 10x risk of death from COVID-19 relative to the general population and the vaccine is 90% effective at preventing death, one could see similar death rates between older vaccinated individuals and the unvaccinated general population.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes jim mcnamara, bhobba, pinball1970 and 3 others
  • #437
Alberta leader apologizes, imposes restrictions and passport
https://apnews.com/article/lifestyl...rus-pandemic-498d4000ffc7a456f3cd58e7fe916e3e
TORONTO (AP) — The leader of the Canadian province of Alberta apologized Wednesday for his handling of the pandemic and says he’s now reluctantly introducing a vaccine passport and imposing a mandatory work from home order two months after lifting nearly all restrictions.

Alberta declared a public health state of emergency as Premier Jason Kenney said hospitals may run out of beds and staff in intensive care units within 10 days.

“It is now clear that we were wrong, and for that I apologize,” Kenney said.

Indoor dining at pubs and restaurants is now banned.

https://www.Alberta.ca/covid-19-variants.aspx
To date, 4 variants of concern have been identified in Alberta. The B.1.617 variant is the dominant strain in Alberta.

https://www.wral.com/latest-who-reports-big-drop-in-new-coronavirus-infections/19876980/?version=amp
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska is reporting its highest number of new Coronavirus cases a day after the state’s largest hospital announced it had entered crisis protocol and started rationing care because of a flood of COVID-19 cases.

Officials on Wednesday reported 1,068 new virus infections, which is 13% higher than last week. State officials say 201 Alaskans are hospitalized for COVID-19, and 34 of them are on ventilators.

The state’s chief medical officer says hospitals continue to be stressed and there isn’t capacity for patients who have COVID-19 as well as those with other needs. Statewide, there are about 1,100 non-intensive care unit beds in hospitals, with only 302 available Wednesday. Only 21 of the state's ICU beds are open.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #438
Jonathan Scott said:
Today's UK reported Covid deaths (from https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/) brings the total reported in the last 7 days to 983. That is equivalent to a yearly rate of over 51,000.

Australia will not put up with that. If we get levels like that with 95% over 60 vaccinated, 70% for everybody else over 12, plus light measures such as tracing, mask-wearing, social distancing, etc., but not vaccination passes; the government will put much more robust rules in place. I believe we should not open up until 80% vaccinated and have no vaccine passports. We should then work towards 95% over 60 and 90% for the rest. Already MD consultations have proven effective in suburbs of NSW, with vaccination rates now as high as 100% in some postcodes. Local MD's are working flat out, personally going from house to house ensuring vaccination. If we could get nearly 100% voluntary, that would be something. While Australia was slow off the mark, it would be a real feather in our cap. I believe compulsory MD consultations and doctors going house to house is the way to increase vaccine uptake - I'm not too fond of passports, etc. Voluntary is always better. But make no mistake, Australia will introduce more robust measures if necessary like no jab, no government welfare (even though it promised not to) if we get UK type death numbers.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #439
nsaspook said:
I'm in the club too. My Doc is telling the immunocompromised to get the 3rd shot now before the booster herd jams the shot line.

I may be too charitable, but I believe in everyone at least being offered two doses before getting the third. As I mentioned in some suburbs, GP's personally visiting people in their homes proves very effective. One multilingual doctor finds that when he explains in the person's native language, it is very effective against vaccine hesitancy. But at 60, it is taking it out of him. He returns home each night exhausted. His wife is worried about his health, but he considers the work vital. Aussies always extoll the unsung hero - the battler as we call them - the person that tries even against nearly impossible odds and never gives up. They still exist. It is humbling. True heroes all, just like those risking their lives to get the vaccine out to remote villages in Nepal.

Thanks
Bill.
 
  • Like
Likes nsaspook, pinball1970 and Astronuc
  • #440
Latest Burnet Modelling and assumptions:
https://burnet.edu.au/system/asset/file/4727/210611-COVASIM-3840px.png

With high vaccination rates, the ones really at risk are the small number not vaccinated

Australia has announced once everyone has been offered two doses, third doses will be rolled out - probably early next year. With high vaccination rates and third doses, I think we are in good shape. BTW that is without even light precautions. With those things will be even better.

My conclusion is to vaccinate, vaccinate and then vaccinate more. Sending GP's house to house is the measure I would use to get high vaccination rates. No coercive measures are I think necessary - but we will see.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #441
Looks like the French are serious about vaccinations:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58581682

"About 3,000 health workers in France have been suspended because they have not been vaccinated against Covid-19.
A new rule, which came into force on Wednesday, made vaccination mandatory for the country's 2.7 million health, care home and fire service staff.
But French Health Minister Olivier Véran said on Thursday that "most of the suspensions are only temporary".
Many are now agreeing to get jabbed because "they see that the vaccination mandate is a reality", he said.
The rule applies to all doctors, nurses, office staff and volunteers."
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes bhobba and pinball1970
  • #442
bhobba said:
Latest Burnet Modelling and assumptions:
https://burnet.edu.au/system/asset/file/4727/210611-COVASIM-3840px.png

With high vaccination rates, the ones really at risk are the small number not vaccinated
I guess it depends on what one means by at risk, since at high rates, a large proportion of deaths will be among the vaccinated, because no vaccine is perfect.

Could I ask you what you think of the Grattan Institute modelling?
https://grattan.edu.au/report/race-to-80/

Is this a decent summary of the discussion in Australia at the moment?
https://www.smh.com.au/national/the...-life-after-restrictions-20210910-p58qmp.html
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and pinball1970
  • #443
In one regional hospital of 83 hospitalized with COVID-19, 11 vaccinated (breakthrough), 72 not fully vaccinated (or perhaps unvaccinated), and of those 17 of the non-fully-vaccinated in ICU.

Edit/update: I understand that the state of Idaho (east of Washington) is send critical patients to hospitals in Washington (probably Seattle, and may be Spokane as well?), since they have run out of beds in their major hospitals, and small rural and regional hospitals don't have ICU facilities in many cases.
 

Attachments

  • KadlecRegionalHospital_Covid_Stats09142021.jpg
    KadlecRegionalHospital_Covid_Stats09142021.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 58
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes bhobba and pinball1970
  • #444
atyy said:
Could I ask you what you think of the Grattan Institute modelling?
https://grattan.edu.au/report/race-to-80/

Is this a decent summary of the discussion in Australia at the moment?
https://www.smh.com.au/national/the...-life-after-restrictions-20210910-p58qmp.html

80% is OK - but 95%+, as detailed in the Burnet model, is what we should aim for. However, opening up at 80% is fine as long as we continue vaccinating, as detailed in the Burnett model. They even think 60% is OK providing vaccinations continue. The Burnett model's only precaution is voluntary but recommended mask-wearing, presumably indoors, because you generally do not catch it in open outdoor spaces.

Yes, it is a reasonable summary. But I am optimistic we will get 95%+ vaccination. Even now many Sydney suburbs have 90% first doses:
https://www.theguardian.com/austral...urb-percentages-interactive-map-vaccine-rates

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Love
Likes atyy
  • #445
I have been thinking about the various models and looking at the vaccination rates in NSW. Many postcodes have exceptionally high first dose vaccinations, 90%+; virtually all of which will become fully vaccinated. And even in the 90%+ postcodes, first doses are increasing. That I think is essential to opening up. You can open up at lower levels like 70% or 80% two doses with medium restrictions. The first doses will not take too long to become second doses, and over 90%+ fully vaccinated. Authorities can dial the rules back to low limits. When 95%+ then no restrictions except voluntary mask-wearing, social distancing etc., can be used. I am not a believer in vaccine passports within a country because of the difficulty in implementing them. Businesses on the verge of going under would not have much to lose if caught violating it. And at high vaccination rates not sure how effective it would be.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #446
bhobba said:
I have been thinking about the various models and looking at the vaccination rates in NSW. Many postcodes have exceptionally high first dose vaccinations, 90%+; virtually all will become fully vaccinated. And even in the 90%+ postcodes, first doses are increasing. That I think is essential to opening up. You can open up at lower levels like 70% or 80% with medium restrictions. It will not take too long for the first doses to become second doses, and over 90%+ fully vaccinated. Authorities can dial the rules back to low restrictions. When 95%+ then no restrictions except voluntary mask-wearing, social distancing etc., can be used. I am not a believer in vaccine passports within a country because of the difficulty in implementing them. Businesses on the verge of going under would not have much to lose if caught violating it. And at high vaccination rates not sure how effective it would be.

Thanks
Bill
Is that 90% of the adult population (over 18's)?
 
  • #447
PeroK said:
Is that 90% of the adult population (over 18's)?

At the moment, it is over 16's, but over 12's have been approved and should be included IMHO. Interestingly, while the over 12's have only just been approved, their vaccination is quickly proceeding. Eventually, once proven safe, under 12's as well. But for initial opening up over 16's, I think we are okay with moderate and then light restrictions. Brisbane, at the moment, is under moderate limits, and I find them not much trouble - even went to a restaurant last week for the first time in 18 months. I am getting a good feeling about things in Aus.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #448
Sad story, "An infant died from COVID-19 in Orange County, a sobering first for the county since the pandemic began about 18 months ago."
https://news.yahoo.com/watch-live-orange-county-covid-144300500.html

Raul Pino, state health officer in the county, said he could not give more details because of laws protecting an individual’s health information.

He said the child, under a year old, could be more easily identified if other details were revealed such as exact age, ethnicity and gender.

The baby’s death was among 56 from COVID-19 reported to Florida health officials over the past four days, raising the pandemic’s death toll among Orange County residents to 1,780, including 337 in August, the deadliest month so far, Pino said at a briefing Monday morning with reporters.
 
  • Sad
Likes bhobba
  • #449
Ygggdrasil said:
This is not a correct number. The survey says that 45% of unvaccinated American adults will definitely not receive the vaccine. Given that ~69% of the adults in the US have received at least one dose of the vaccine, this would amount to only about 14% of US adults.

From the uptake in Sydney, shockingly, many postcodes are over 90% first dose, some even 90% two doses; as I mentioned before, at least one 100%. Maybe the number of antivaccine types here in Aus is not as significant as I thought. We have a 95% uptake of triple antigen. Fingers crossed, we can achieve that with Covid. What worries me are the Aboriginal communities.

Wilcannia in NSW, population 700, was exposed to Covid on August 13, and within a month, more than 100 people had Covid. “Wilcannia tells many things. It was a town already with a high burden of chronic disease and previously reported as one of the towns with the lowest life expectancy and shows how inequities can play out in a pandemic,” epidemiologist Professor Ward said.

We must protect indigenous people - they are very vulnerable.

For 16 and over, overall, Australia now has well over 70% one dose and is closing in on 50% two doses. We have a super Pfizer vaccine weekend here in Brisbane where anyone can walk in and get a Pfizer dose. From 10 am, many centres had to turn people away - uptake was so significant. That was yesterday. They were asked to come back today - the same thing happened. Here it is vaccine supply that is the issue. Everyone wants the Phizer, and now Moderna with that arriving in Aus. Nobody wants the Astrazenica except people like me that do not care about the one in a million chance of dying - there is 2.5 a million chance of dying just getting out of bed each morning - yet people still, of course, do it. Even when that is pointed out, people do not want it - it is bonkers. We have millions of doses of AZ. Australia could reach 70% vaccinated quicker, just by people not being afraid of AZ when our Covid plan (which I think is too optimistic) says we can go to medium restrictions rather than lockdowns. If we keep vaccinating until 80%, we can have low restrictions (but still restrictions) - over 90% just voluntary restrictions. Can Australia do it? Singapore tried opening up at 80% and realized you needed at least 90%:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09...-vaccination-but-life-is-not-normal/100450154

I think opening up with medium restrictions (not low restrictions as our Covid plan says) at 80% double vaccinated is OK - but you should have at least 90% single vaccinated and increasing so soon all will be 90% vaccinated and heading towards 95% - or life will not be like before the pandemic. BTW that is 95% over 12 and as soon as safe 95% under 12 as well.

Just to be clear, I think Australia's current plan is too optimistic:
https://www.pm.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/national-plan-to-transition-australias-national-covid-19-response-30-july-2021.pdf

What I think Australia should do is medium restrictions at 80%, not 70%. Low restrictions 90%, and just voluntary restrictions 95%. That is my view from the number of models I have seen and the experience in Singapore.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes benorin
  • #450
bhobba said:
Singapore tried opening up at 80% and realized you needed at least 90%:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09...-vaccination-but-life-is-not-normal/100450154
That may not be the right reading. While Singapore's overall population coverage is good, its coverage of the elderly is poor. We know vaccination doesn't prevent transmission by much, so if the aim is to prevent severe disease and death in the transition to endemicity, the elderly must be vaccinated at high rates.. The Burnet Institute and Grattan Institute assume 95% coverage for the elderly. Yet while I constantly heard the 80% population target from the Singapore government, I have never heard them give a target coverage for the elderly. In early September, Singapore's coverage of those aged 70+ was 88% for first doses and 85% for second doses. In that age group, the UK had 93% full vaccination (two doses) coverage a month before it opened up, and Denmark, Ireland, Portugal and Spain are at 97-99% full vaccination coverage. It should be no surprise that Singapore has not vaccinated enough, or rather not vaccinated the right people.

So both the Burnet (opening up at 60% if 95% of those 60+ age fully vaccinated) and Grattan modelling (opening up at 80% populaton coverage with 95% elderly coverage) would say Singapore should not open up, since its vaccination rate in the elderly is way below 95%.

Lone Simonsen, speaking with Kai Kupferschmidt, says pretty much the same thing: "So should other countries follow Denmark? “If you have a lower coverage in the elderly, you should not try to do what Denmark is trying right now.”, @LoneSimonsen2 told me. “We’re simply banking on this full coverage of the people at high risk.”"
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes nsaspook, Evo and bhobba
  • #451
atyy said:
So both the Burnet (opening up at 60% if 95% of those 60+ age fully vaccinated) and Grattan modelling (opening up at 80% populaton coverage with 95% elderly coverage) would say Singapore should not open up, since its vaccination rate in the elderly is way below 95%.

Critical point. Thanks for highlighting it. Just as important is jobs like first responders, doctors, nurses, aged care workers etc., having 100% coverage. Interestingly, we now have some epidemiologists here in Aus who want to wait until 90% before going to medium restrictions (along with the other stuff above). I am not of that view, but they are epidemiologists. I am not. But with what is happening in NSW with so many postcodes hitting 90%+ it may be a bit of a moot point.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #452
bhobba said:
I may be too charitable, but I believe in everyone at least being offered two doses before getting the third. As I mentioned in some suburbs, GP's personally visiting people in their homes proves very effective. One multilingual doctor finds that when he explains in the person's native language, it is very effective against vaccine hesitancy. But at 60, it is taking it out of him. He returns home each night exhausted. His wife is worried about his health, but he considers the work vital. Aussies always extoll the unsung hero - the battler as we call them - the person that tries even against nearly impossible odds and never gives up. They still exist. It is humbling. True heroes all, just like those risking their lives to get the vaccine out to remote villages in Nepal.

Thanks
Bill.
Here in certain parts of the US, mainly the the highly unvaccinated parts, doctors going door to door trying to vaccinate people would most likely get shot. It's sad.

I can't quote much of this article, it's too political, IMO. But the conditions in

Idaho - Hospitals there have become so overwhelmed by COVID patients, almost all of them unvaccinated, that the state has activated its "crisis standards of care." What that means, according to the state Department of Health and Welfare, is that the normal triage standards, in which the more seriously sick or injured are prioritized, are thrown out.

Idaho Health Department Director Dave Jeppesen -

Instead, "someone who is otherwise healthy and would recover more rapidly may get treated or have access to a ventilator before someone who is not likely to recover."

As the agency's director, Dave Jeppesen, put it in announcing the order, “The situation is dire — we don’t have enough resources to adequately treat the patients in our hospitals, whether you are there for COVID-19 or a heart attack or because of a car accident.”

Jeppesen was not exaggerating the crisis. His agency reported that a record 678 patients were hospitalized with COVID-19 in Idaho as of Monday, including 173 in intensive care — and those almost certainly were undercounts. On Wednesday, the state said, only 12 adult ICU beds were staffed and available in the entire state.

As many as 97% of the COVID patients in Idaho intensive care units were unvaccinated. That's no surprise, because Idaho has one of the lowest vaccination rates in the country, as reckoned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Added later:
Link removed as too political.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Sad
Likes pinball1970, Ivan Seeking, bhobba and 2 others
  • #453
Evo said:
Here in certain parts of the US, mainly the the highly unvaccinated parts, doctors going door to door trying to vaccinate people would most likely get shot. It's sad.

Oh my god. That is scary. This is in the middle of a pandemic, people dying, and someone from your local community knocks on your door and asks can we talk about the pandemic. In particularly religious areas, they are going with local religious leaders. In other places with leaders in the community. A lot of the people are old, infirmed and have few visitors plus speak poor English. Often they have been alerted by support organisations like the one I use, Anglicare - the Anglican Church-run organisation that helps disabled and older adults like me. That is a problem because the care workers themselves are often scared of vaccination, and I have to reassure/educate some that visit me. However, some are very much on the ball - usually doing it as a stepping stone to be a nurse. Even a nurse did it while waiting for a nursing job to open up in Anglicare.

Just as an aside, here is the info put out by the Royal Australian College Of General Practitioners on the mathematics of the pandemic that I show to people that need information:
https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2020/may/mathematics-for-medical-practitioners

A little calculation shows that even assuming 100% vaccine effectiveness we need at least 86% vaccination using an R0 of 7. It is more complex than that of course, but it shows why we need such a high rate of vaccination.

Here is a link to their recommended resource: Mathematic epidemiology: Past, present, and future by Brauer:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001967/

The above is only for the mathematically literate. Some like to see the detail, and epidemiologists are not just running around in the dark. Anyone can understand the first link. I believe it needs to be part of the science curriculum in all schools.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes atyy and Evo
  • #454
As posted before, here is Australias plan for the pandemic:
https://www.pm.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/national-plan-to-transition-australias-national-covid-19-response-30-july-2021.pdf

Based on NSW data, it is now projected that the 70% vaccinated phase will last ten days. Why worry about that phase now beats me - wait until you get 80% vaccinated. Even that I do not think will last long. We could wait until 90% then move to the post-vaccination phase. The biggest problem I see, as Atty alluded to; we must ensure the vulnerable and those in high-risk occupations are fully vaccinated. I am seeing my GP today - it will be interesting what he thinks.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • #455
I have a Q: is 25-30 people gathering together outside in 90 degree whether for a funeral a good idea? Assuming they wear masks. This happens tomorrow so if you can a quick answer it would be appreciated. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
17
Replies
562
Views
26K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
746
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
928
  • Biology and Medical
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
6
Replies
177
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
929
Back
Top