Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Jokes
In summary: It's a humor that relies on absurdity and unexpectedness. It's not for everyone.Not a fan of surrealism, I take it?In summary, surrealism is an art form that relies on absurdity and unexpectedness, often producing incongruous imagery or effects. It may not be appreciated by everyone, but for those who do, it can be quite humorous.
  • #3,501
DaveC426913 said:
I just saw this one on America's Funniest Home People!
Ha! You outed one of my prime sources! :-p

(I think you meant "Videos" not "People".)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,502
DaveC426913 said:
Well, that's why it's a verbal joke. :smile:

Here is a print joke that does not work verbally:

There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those that understand binary and those that don't.
 
  • Like
Likes EnumaElish, AlexCaledin, OmCheeto and 1 other person
  • #3,503
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
There were two brothers from Scotland. They went into the transportation industry, taking people between Glasgow and nearby small towns.

The business went very well, until one day there was a tragic accident. One of the brothers broke his neck.
Quite a business! Fast too! ...
 
  • #3,504
BillTre said:
Here is a print joke that does not work verbally:

There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those that understand binary and those that don't.
Well, you do and I do so that makes 10 of us.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri and BillTre
  • #3,505
phinds said:
Well, you do and I do so that makes 10 of us.
11.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #3,507
This might make a decent series progression question for a SAT test.
 
  • #3,508
BillTre said:
Here is a print joke that does not work verbally:

There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those that understand binary and those that don't.
phinds said:
Well, you do and I do so that makes 10 of us.
... or it's a regular 10 (ten) ... and he doesn't! ...
 
Last edited:
  • #3,509
jtbell said:
(I think you meant "Videos" not "People".)
There used to be two shows aired simultaneously: AFHV and AFP.
My wife kept getting them confused and calling them America's Funniest Home People. So it stuck.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #3,510
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
There were two brothers from Scotland. They went into the transportation industry, taking people between Glasgow and nearby small towns.

The business went very well, until one day there was a tragic accident. One of the brothers broke his neck.
Either I am a dunce, or you have a morbid sense of humour.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and fresh_42
  • #3,511
DaveC426913 said:
Either I am a dunce, or you have a morbid sense of humour.
Yeah, Dave, I didn't get that one either.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #3,512
DaveC426913 said:
Either I am a dunce, or you have a morbid sense of humour.

phinds said:
Yeah, Dave, I didn't get that one either.

He was carrying people on his neck! Didn't you get it?
 
  • Like
Likes Aufbauwerk 2045
  • #3,513
Stavros Kiri said:
He was carrying people on his neck! Didn't you get it?
Ah! No, I didn't.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #3,514
DaveC426913 said:
Ah! No, I didn't.
Took me some time too, but I thought it qualified as a good "groaner" ...
(See also #3503)
 
Last edited:
  • #3,515
Stavros Kiri said:
He was carrying people on his neck! Didn't you get it?

I also didn't get it right away. An Englishman explained it to me. He understood it instantly. Think about why the brothers, who are from Scotland, carried people instead of buying a vehicle.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #3,516
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
I also didn't get it right away. An Englishman explained it to me. He understood it instantly. Think about why the brothers, who are from Scotland, carried people instead of buying a vehicle.
The problem was in the original wording. It talked of "taking people' and not 'carrying people'. I think you would need to be psychic to have got it with that word wrong. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #3,517
collinsmark said:
Why would cows be eating chickens in the first place? It just doesn't make sense. What is going on around me in this world?! :confused::woot::nb)
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #3,518
sophiecentaur said:
The problem was in the original wording. It talked of "taking people' and not 'carrying people'. I think you would need to be psychic to have got it with that word wrong. :smile:
Wow! I'm either psychic!(?) ... or I actually evaluated the whole sentence, which talked about transportation business:
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
They went into the transportation industry, taking people between Glasgow and nearby small towns.
I think it's fairly clear.
[but not to say the same about the neck part, I agree ...]
 
Last edited:
  • #3,519
What will they think of next?

"Why does a chicken coop have 2 doors? Because, if it had 4 doors it would be chicken sedan."
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Stavros Kiri and BillTre
  • #3,520
collinsmark said:
Why would cows be eating chickens in the first place? It just doesn't make sense. What is going on around me in this world?! :confused::woot::nb)
jtbell said:

+ check this out!:


It's called "Evolution" ... so to speak ...
 
  • #3,521
Stavros Kiri said:
I think it's fairly clear.
[but not to say the same about the neck part, I agree ...]
Maybe they were traveling at a breakneck speed.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and Stavros Kiri
  • #3,522
jtbell said:

Stavros Kiri said:
+ check this out!:


It's called "Evolution" ... so to speak ...


Oh, my. :bugeye:
 
  • #3,523
Buckleymanor said:
Maybe they were traveling at a breakneck speed.
... or breakneck weight ...
 
  • #3,524
so profound ! :rolleyes:

upload_2017-3-22_12-36-57.png
 
  • Like
Likes Borg and OmCheeto
  • #3,525
davenn said:
so profound ! :rolleyes:

View attachment 114891
Then that's a "check" (√) formation, not a V formation ...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #3,526
17390576_1869890709934286_5669247446373780608_o.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes EnumaElish, AlexCaledin, jtbell and 2 others
  • #3,527
Rare funny video (Jim Carrey in his first steps ...):


And ... a later one:
 
  • Like
Likes EnumaElish
  • #3,529
The pessimist sees only darkness in a tunnel.
The optimist sees the light at the end of the tunnel.
The realist recognizes the light is an oncoming train.
The train driver sees three idiots on the track.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, hsdrop, member 587159 and 5 others
  • #3,530
fresh_42 said:
The pessimist sees only darkness in a tunnel.
The optimist sees the light at the end of the tunnel.
The realist recognizes the light is an oncoming trains.
The train driver sees three idiots on the track.
What if the realist is the optimist!? Then there is only two idiots!

Another similar:

The pessimist sees that the train has descended into the tunnel.
The optimist sees that it will come back out rising again.
The smart train driver has secretly abandoned the train inside the downhill tunnel, because it has no brakes!
Question: How many people inside the train wear tie?
Answer: Soon it won't matter! :biggrin::oldbiggrin::oldsurprised:
 
  • Like
Likes EnumaElish, AlexCaledin and nuuskur
  • #3,531
bat-man-jpg.104956.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes EnumaElish
  • #3,532
Stavros Kiri said:
Another similar:

The pessimist sees that the train has descended into the tunnel.
The optimist sees that it will come back out rising again.
The smart train driver has secretly abandoned the train inside the downhill tunnel, because it has no breaks!
Question: How many people inside the train wear tie?
Answer: Soon it won't matter! :biggrin::oldbiggrin::oldsurprised:
Soon everyone will wear one.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #3,533
Why would the driver abandon the train if it's not broken? :oldconfused:
 
  • #3,534
Borg said:
Why would the driver abandon the train if it's not broken? :oldconfused:
Without brakes and downhill (possibly with turns) it would (could) get off track soon ... and he is a whimp! ... + that was a joke! ...
 
Last edited:
  • #3,535
Stavros Kiri said:
Without breaks and downhill (possibly with turns) it would (could) get off track soon ... and he is a whimp! ... + that was a joke! ...
You mean "without brakes"? :oldwink:
 

Similar threads

Programming Jokes: Lame, Science & Math Jokes!
12
Replies
412
Views
24K
Reflecting on 47: An SMBC Comic
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
Bad Math Jokes
9
Replies
311
Views
29K
Weird / Interesing science related objects
Replies
7
Views
2K
What does it tell if you can (or can't) get this joke?
Replies
15
Views
4K
What Are Your Favorite Physics Jokes?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! - My Favorite Book
Replies
21
Views
3K
Mini road trip: tigers and goats and bears, oh my
Replies
5
Views
2K
That Will Smith and Chris Rock thing
6
Replies
185
Views
8K
Collection of Science Jokes P2
105
Replies
4K
Views
388K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top