Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Jokes
In summary: It's a humor that relies on absurdity and unexpectedness. It's not for everyone.Not a fan of surrealism, I take it?In summary, surrealism is an art form that relies on absurdity and unexpectedness, often producing incongruous imagery or effects. It may not be appreciated by everyone, but for those who do, it can be quite humorous.
  • #10,501
1630973784237.png
 
  • Haha
Likes strangerep
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #10,502
main-qimg-b2a1bc3e5a153c25c10c1ecb5b4671c3-mzj.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes strangerep and Ivan Seeking
  • #10,503
1630979030448.png
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, fresh_42, BillTre and 3 others
  • #10,504
main-qimg-3105026eba84a1c46169f817421fe47e-mzj.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Borg, Ivan Seeking, david2 and 3 others
  • #10,505
Screen Shot 2021-09-07 at 7.58.54 AM.png


Screen Shot 2021-09-07 at 8.01.18 AM.png


Screen Shot 2021-09-07 at 8.02.27 AM.png


Screen Shot 2021-09-07 at 8.03.34 AM.png


Screen Shot 2021-09-07 at 8.04.42 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes phinds, strangerep, Borg and 7 others
  • #10,506
BillTre said:
Twist: she dumps him because he's incompatible with her ISO-8601 preference.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and BillTre
  • #10,507
Ibix said:
Twist: she dumps him because he's incompatible with her ISO-8601 preference.
Even ISO-8601 is stupid. The only reasonable format is YYYYMMDDHHMMSS with ##0\leq HH \leq 23.##
No reason for any minuses.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and DaveC426913
  • #10,508
fresh_42 said:
Even ISO-8601 is stupid. The only reasonable format is YYYYMMDDHHMMSS with ##0\leq HH \leq 23.##
No reason for any minuses.
Indeed. The only unambiguous format.
Also, mostly presaged by Star Trek.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and Ibix
  • #10,509
fresh_42 said:
No reason for any minuses.
It makes them more readable to most humans.
 
  • #10,510
fresh_42 said:
Even ISO-8601 is stupid. The only reasonable format is YYYYMMDDHHMMSS with ##0\leq HH \leq 23.##
No reason for any minuses.
Needs to also include Daylight Savings Time status. Otherwise, there are ambiguous entries every Fall (when our clocks "Fall Back" an hour).
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #10,511
berkeman said:
Needs to also include Daylight Savings Time status. Otherwise, there are ambiguous entries every Fall (when our clocks "Fall Back" an hour).
GMT.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #10,512
_nc_ohc=JIRKopR0zAEAX9wac3R&_nc_ht=scontent-ham3-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes phinds, david2, WWGD and 1 other person
  • #10,513
berkeman said:
Needs to also include Daylight Savings Time status.
Need to eliminate Daylight Savings forever. Problem solved.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Bystander and fresh_42
  • #10,514
DaveC426913 said:
Need to eliminate Daylight Savings forever. Problem solved.
I've heard of more radical proposals that time zones themselves be eliminated. Not sure how well that would work.
 
  • #10,515
WWGD said:
I've heard of more radical proposals that time zones themselves be eliminated. Not sure how well that would work.
It works in the airline industry.
 
  • #10,516
fresh_42 said:
It works in the airline industry.
And in China
 
  • #10,517
Ibix said:
It makes them more readable to most humans.
Frontend problem.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #10,518
gmax137 said:
And in China
Though the majority of its population lives in the East Coast. That may have to see with it.
 
  • #10,519
main-qimg-ba29d8537ec85056a95a6b8d6a45ea56-mzj.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes berkeman, jack action, Ibix and 4 others
  • #10,520
fresh_42 said:
It works in the airline industry.
Good, so it is employed.
 
  • #10,521
DaveC426913 said:
Need to eliminate Daylight Savings forever. Problem solved.
So do we permantly spring forward, or forever fall backward? Inquiring minds want to know.

(BTW, I agree it would be best to not keep changing back and forth, but I don't know which of the two choices is best...)
 
  • #10,522
berkeman said:
So do we permantly spring forward, or forever fall backward? Inquiring minds want to know.

(BTW, I agree it would be best to not keep changing back and forth, but I don't know which of the two choices is best...)
Spring Forward first Winter day. Until First Spring day. Problem solved.
 
  • #10,523
WWGD said:
I've heard of more radical proposals that time zones themselves be eliminated. Not sure how well that would work.
Philosophers. Pfffft!

or possibly hippies.
 
  • #10,524
Ivan Seeking said:
Philosophers. Pfffft!
Or, as DuMaurier (Fake Philosopher name) put it in his 1721 treatise: " Don't Need no Stinkin Philosophy).

BTW, Philosophy was originally a treatise on people with first name 'Phil'.
 
  • #10,525
WWGD said:
I've heard of more radical proposals that time zones themselves be eliminated. Not sure how well that would work.
Then I vote for Epoch time.
 
  • #10,526
jack action said:
Then I vote for Epoch time.
Same as Sidereal time?
 
  • #10,528
main-qimg-a21f28389bfc66384a00d4459394eefc-mzj.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Likes Ivan Seeking
  • #10,529
fresh_42 said:
Even ISO-8601 is stupid. The only reasonable format is YYYYMMDDHHMMSS with ##0\leq HH \leq 23.##
What about 12,000 years from now? Not very future proof.

Oh, wait... Humanity is almost certain to have destroyed itself long before then. :oldfrown:
 
  • Haha
Likes jack action
  • #10,530
main-qimg-a711f3cc03d3383a89c40202f60a532c-mzj.jpeg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary and BillTre
  • #10,531
strangerep said:
What about 12,000 years from now? Not very future proof.
You mean they will still have COBOL programs running?
strangerep said:
Oh, wait... Humanity is almost certain to have destroyed itself long before then. :oldfrown:
Another Carrington event will do.
 
  • #10,532
berkeman said:
So do we permantly spring forward, or forever fall backward? Inquiring minds want to know.

(BTW, I agree it would be best to not keep changing back and forth, but I don't know which of the two choices is best...)
Noon should correspond as closely as possible to the Sun being at its zenith.
 
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #10,533
fresh_42 said:
You mean they will still have COBOL programs running?

Another Carrington event will do.
I don't see why become concerned over something that will happen long after we're all dead.
 
Last edited:
  • #10,534
WWGD said:
I don't see why become concern over sonething that will happen long after we're all dead.
Carrington is overdue, so I wouldn't bet.
 
  • #10,535
fresh_42 said:
Carrington is overdue, so I wouldn't bet.
Never met him.
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
12
Replies
406
Views
21K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
826
  • General Discussion
8
Replies
277
Views
25K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
185
Views
7K
Back
Top