- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Nicholson: Introduction to Abstract Algebra, Section 6.3 Splitting Fields.
Example 1 reads as follows: (see attachment)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 1. Find an extension [TEX] E \supseteq \mathbb{Z}_2 [/TEX] in which [TEX] f(x) = x^3 + x + 1 [/TEX] factors completely into linear factors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The solution reads as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution. The polynomial f(x) is irreducible over [TEX] \mathbb{Z}_2 [/TEX] (it has no root in [TEX] \mathbb{Z}_2 [/TEX] ) so
[TEX] E = \{ a_0 + a_1 t + a_2 t^2 \ | \ a_i \in \mathbb{Z}_2 , f(t) = 0 \} [/TEX]
is a field containing a root t of f(x).
Hence x + t = x - t is a factor of f(x)
The division algorithm gives [TEX] f(x) = (x+t) g(x) [/TEX] where [TEX] g(x) = x^2 + tx + (1 + t^2) [/TEX]
, so it suffices to show that g(x) also factors completely in E.
Trial and error give [TEX] g(t^2) = 0 [/TEX] so [TEX] g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) [/TEX] for some [TEX] v \in F[/TEX].
... ... etc (see attachment)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that I cannot show how [TEX] g(t^2) = 0 [/TEX] implies that [TEX] g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) [/TEX] for some [TEX] v \in F[/TEX].
I would appreciate some help.
Peter
[Note; This has also been posted on MHF]
Example 1 reads as follows: (see attachment)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 1. Find an extension [TEX] E \supseteq \mathbb{Z}_2 [/TEX] in which [TEX] f(x) = x^3 + x + 1 [/TEX] factors completely into linear factors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The solution reads as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution. The polynomial f(x) is irreducible over [TEX] \mathbb{Z}_2 [/TEX] (it has no root in [TEX] \mathbb{Z}_2 [/TEX] ) so
[TEX] E = \{ a_0 + a_1 t + a_2 t^2 \ | \ a_i \in \mathbb{Z}_2 , f(t) = 0 \} [/TEX]
is a field containing a root t of f(x).
Hence x + t = x - t is a factor of f(x)
The division algorithm gives [TEX] f(x) = (x+t) g(x) [/TEX] where [TEX] g(x) = x^2 + tx + (1 + t^2) [/TEX]
, so it suffices to show that g(x) also factors completely in E.
Trial and error give [TEX] g(t^2) = 0 [/TEX] so [TEX] g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) [/TEX] for some [TEX] v \in F[/TEX].
... ... etc (see attachment)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that I cannot show how [TEX] g(t^2) = 0 [/TEX] implies that [TEX] g(x) = (x + t^2)(x + v) [/TEX] for some [TEX] v \in F[/TEX].
I would appreciate some help.
Peter
[Note; This has also been posted on MHF]