- #281
DevilsAvocado
Gold Member
- 848
- 91
Crazymechanic said:Toys or no toys , let's be honest here , all Russia needs and wants from Ukraine is either a pro Russian or neutral government.As long as Ukraine is neutral , I think Kremlin is fine.
Yes, but some of the trouble here is that there seems to be different interpretations of "neutral". If we rewind the tape; all the people of Ukraine wanted, was better relations with EU, and an end of the terrible corruption in Ukraine, but Putin obviously didn't like this version of "neutrality". In Putin's world "neutrality" equals – You can do anything you want, as long as you do what I tell you!
Of course EU should have acted much smarter; they should for example not have let Sweden's Minister for Foreign Affairs, Carl Bildt run around Eurosquare like a new "Charles XII", shouting about "Quislings" and stuff.
And EU should of course have include Putin in the negotiations with Ukraine, where they should have given him full guaranties for that Ukraine would never be a member of EU, without Russia's approval, and that Ukraine would never ever be a member of NATO, in any case.
This could maybe have opened up new and real opportunities for everybody involved... perhaps.
Crazymechanic said:I just can't understand some of the arguments put foward here , do you really think Putin is simple stupid or dreaming of Stalin? he amy have his preferances but he is not dumb , he wouldn't put his amry into Ukraine just for a few oil and gas deals , there is great western influence in Ukraine and some of the poeple in power are also not the nicest folks around , but somehow that skips the western media.
I can't tell you exactly what I think* about Putin (because it would violate the forum rules ), I can only provide these quotes, from high-rank officials:
- Madeleine Albright – "Russian president is delusional"
- Angela Merkel – "[he] ...lives in a world of his own"
Does this mean this man is sick/nuts? Well, from our perspective it looks like this conclusion could maybe be drawn, but from the Russian perspective many (most?) would say that this is terrible mudslinging, as they see Putin as the best and brightest that has happened to Russia in decades:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIX-hOzyWkY
http://www.youtube.com/embed/kIX-hOzyWkY
To me this is much closer to Stalin than Gorbachev, don't you think?
We have to remember that this guy throws political opponents and folks he doesn't like in jail, in parody trials, and critical journalists lose their lives in 'accidents', and Putin looks at EU as a bunch decadent loser, and the 'nickname' is Gayrope.
In a Russian perspective, what Putin has done in Crimea is certainly not crazy or dumb, but brave and patriotic. There's only one problem; this "brave patriotism" did work in 1968, but it doesn't work today, and this is what the old KGB agent Vladimir Putin obviously has gotten wrong.
So Putin has already lost, because the resolution to this will not be a "New Prague" and a 'nice & cozy' little "Cold War" (that could boost Putin's popularity even more), but two alternatives of: Russian Financial Meltdown vs. WW3 (bye bye Putin in both cases).
He obviously doesn't realize what he has done... and that could maybe be characterized as "living in a world of his own"...
And who can blame him, with all this silly walks...?
About the not-so-nice-folk-SS in Ukraine: They are a minority and a consequence of previous regime, and as soon as Ukraine becomes a working democracy, the fertile soil for this kind of elements will disappear, hopefully completely.
Crazymechanic said:I'm not saying I agree with military intervention from either side but I'm also putting quite clearly that if everyone or someone thinks Ukraine has now gotten much much better leaders than the previous ones , well all I can say is " think twice" .
Also I can bet my whole money that Putin knows damn well what his doing and the possible sanctions and outcomes or his gains versus his drawbacks from this scenario have also been long before calculated.
Yeah, but the problem is that Putin is using a Russian calculator from 1945, which is sadly missing the "Financial Refactoring" button.
Ukraine can't possible get worse leaders than the bunch of criminals that has ripped off the whole country for personal gains. Poland's economy is twice of what it was in 1991, Ukraine's is half of what it was in 1991...
Crazymechanic said:I think poeple are taking this too easy and simplistic.They just think a little " Napoleon" wants to conquer some new territory , while getting new or maybe I should say old terrotorries back is a gain , it;'s definitely not the main one.
This whole thing sadly but true is not about what the people of Ukriane want it's about the US versus Russia influence war.Somewhere in the middle of all that are the real dreams and hopes of the middle class Ukrainian.
Agreed, the everyday people are the ones suffering, and the truth is that "Napoleon" and his precursors has been using Ukraine as "nuclear buffer zone" against West/NATO, where it was planned that they should take the major blow in case of "total mayhem".
Let's do it right this time, and concentrate on other/nicer/better things than these lethal "toys"...
P.S: Getting old territories back again? Well, with this "logic" Berlusconi, in his heydays, could have invaded a major part of Europe to get "old territories back again"...
Last edited: