Navigating the Tensions in Ukraine: A Scientific Perspective

  • Thread starter fresh_42
  • Start date
In summary, the Munich Agreement was an agreement between the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom that divided Czechoslovakia into the Soviet Union and the United States.
  • #736
fresh_42 said:
We are already in a position to hope for someone to stop Putin. Russia isn't the problem, a wanna-be-Czar is.
If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Vanadium 50, Bystander and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #737
PeroK said:
If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
In a dictatorship (false democracy) that's not so simple.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and fresh_42
  • #738
PeroK said:
If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
Read Gary Kasparov's book "Winter is Coming" and you'll understand how the west contributed to the rise and rise of Mr Putin. The ex world chess champion is as far-sighted politically as ever he was over the chessboard!
 
  • #739
I would personally formulate it this way: Putin and the corrupt, authoritarian, non-democratic system he has established to support him is the problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Oldman too and BillTre
  • #740
Rive said:
In a dictatorship (false democracy) that's not so simple.
He wasn't appointed by a foreign power or by a military coup.The Russian people voted him in and stood back when political opponents were pushed out. They've done almost nothing to stop the rise of a dictator to a position of absolute power.

They had the chance from 1990 to choose democracy and peace with the free world. They choose dictatorship and war with the free world.

Even if Putin goes, who says the Russians won't appoint another dictator to take his place?
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes russ_watters, Vanadium 50, hutchphd and 1 other person
  • #741
neilparker62 said:
Read Gary Kasparov's book "Winter is Coming" and you'll understand how the west contributed to the rise and rise of Mr Putin.
Yes, of course, I forgot. We're to blame. Not the fault of the Russian people at all. Blameless peace-loving citizens of Mother Russia betrayed by the evil citizens of the west, like you and me.

If you could just get rid of all the world's democracies, what a perfect, peaceful place the Earth would be.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, fresh_42 and BillTre
  • #742
It's a good book to read all the same. Recommended.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #743
PeroK said:
If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
It is not that easy. You assume a democracy where there is none.
 
  • #744
PeroK said:
He wasn't appointed by a foreign power or by a military coup.The Russian people voted him in and stood back when political opponents were pushed out. They've done almost nothing to stop the rise of a dictator to a position of absolute power.

They had the chance from 1990 to choose democracy and peace with the free world. They choose dictatorship and war with the free world.

Even if Putin goes, who says the Russians won't appoint another dictator to take his place?
Oliver Cromwell.

It is never nice to reason from a point of absolute safety and to tell ordinary people what to do or not to do. It doesn't belong here, but I am inclined to talk about Northern Ireland or a certain person in a certain street in No. 11, in SW1 City of Westminster.
 
  • #745
fresh_42 said:
It is not that easy. You assume a democracy where there is none.
How did it come to be so undemocratic? Why has the UK never succumbed to the temptation of a strong, dictator who crushes all opposition. I'll accept it might be luck.

I think it was Charles Chaplin who said "if the British Army did the goose step, people would laugh".
 
  • #746
PeroK said:
Yes, of course, I forgot. We're to blame. Not the fault of the Russian people at all. Blameless peace-loving citizens of Mother Russia betrayed by the evil citizens of the west, like you and me.

If you could just get rid of all the world's democracies, what a perfect, peaceful place the Earth would be.
I do not think that sarcasm is a constructive contribution.
 
  • #747
fresh_42 said:
It is not that easy. You assume a democracy where there is none.

Denocracy is not a gift from metaphysical beings. It is not "natural" for any oppressed people. But it seems to find much less fertile soil amongst the Soviet than one might have hoped.

\
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #748
fresh_42 said:
I do not think that sarcasm is a constructive contribution.
Neither is self flagellation.
 
  • #749
Can we turn back to the subject of this thread. I certainly will not hold a lecture in Russian history. Get a book.
 
  • #750
fresh_42 said:
Can we turn back to the subject of this thread. I certainly will not hold a lecture in Russian history.
To misquote James Joyce: history is a nightmare from which we should all try to awaken.
 
  • #751
PeroK said:
To misquote James Joyce: history is a nightmare from which we should all try to awaken.
You can well take the present to observe how a democratically elected president / prime minister / whatever turns into a dictator. Several persons in Europe and nearby are not quite there yet, but they do their best to get there.
 
  • #752
PeroK said:
He wasn't appointed by a foreign power or by a military coup.The Russian people voted him in and stood back when political opponents were pushed out. They've done almost nothing to stop the rise of a dictator to a position of absolute power.
Most of the populace grew up under the Soviet system. There was a small window of opportunity ca. early 1990s, but the hardliners (nationalists) took control over the decade.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and fresh_42
  • #753
Astronuc said:
Most of the populace grew up under the Soviet system.
And it wasn't any better before.
 
  • #754
Astronuc said:
Most of the populace grew up under the Soviet system.
You might have thought that would have given them a belly full of dictatorship and made them less likely to succumb than those who couldn't imagine the horrors.
 
  • #755
fresh_42 said:
And it wasn't any better before.
No, of course not, but that is with what the people were familiar. That's what they knew.
 
  • #756
Well , even though @PeroK seems to dislike me for something which any intellectual person should have never got emotional about, here I have to partly agree with Perok.
If we look back at history at the beginning of the industrial revolution the conditions for workers were awful in all parts of the world. Capitalism back then was without "checks and balances" as we have them now, definitely not on that level.
The ideology of Karl Marx and Engels was popular at the time but it never reached the level of popularity where it could actually "spark" an assisted overthrow of government in any other place than Russia.

I think it is not just a coincidence that it was Russia where Communism began and ended. Yes the poor conditions of peasants and farmers under Czar contributed but also the mentality contributed. Different nations have different mentality. People in the east differ from those in the west not just by their language.
China is another example.

This does not mean that I label all people the same, I do not. But I have to agree from a first person experience with Russians that they tend to be more aggressive on average than a Brit or an American would be. This is my personal experience so no need to criticize it. That being said Russians are some of the best people I know, they are very helpful and such but they do have that "might makes right " type of emotional attitude towards stuff, that I cannot deny.
 
  • #757
Astronuc said:
No, of course not, but that is what the people had familiarity. That's what they knew.
One of the facts why returning to democracy in Germany worked after WW II is, that we had it before and democratic movements since the 19th century. It wasn't a start from scratch and wasn't for 80 years. Some ignore this too often in my opinion and then are surprised that the model does not work elsewhere, e.g. in the middle and not so middle east.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
  • #758
Anyway, this old Russian communist was praying to a bust of Stalin, begging him to return and save Russia once more. He prayed and prayed until one day, to his amazement, the bust spoke in the distinctive voice of uncle Joe.

All right, it said, I'll come back and save Russia. But, this time it will be no more Mr nice guy.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes hutchphd
  • #759
fresh_42 said:
One of the facts why returning to democracy in Germany worked after WW II is, that we had it before and democratic movements since the 19th century. It wasn't a start from scratch and wasn't for 80 years. Some ignore this too often in my opinion and then are surprised that the model does not work elsewhere, e.g. in the middle and not so middle east.
Exactly , on point. Russia has never had a democracy, those few years in the 90's doesn't count, it was more of a wild west, oligarchs grab all type of moment, while Yeltsin was busy getting drunk. (You can check youtube, he was drunk on visits often even)

This is the same reason the US spent billions (trillions? ) in Afghanistan and it all essentially is flushed down the toilet now. The taliban just ran that country over like a freight train.
I'm not saying there aren't people in the middle east or Afghanistan that don't want freedom I'm just saying that apparently their not in the majority. History and tradition is a powerful thing not to be erased that easily. Religion is too. Truth be told my opinion is that their religion is part of the problem but that is a whole different topic that this forums couldn't handle one bit, given how emotional some here get even so far.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #760
fresh_42 said:
One of the facts why returning to democracy in Germany worked after WW II is, that we had it before and democratic movements since the 19th century. It wasn't a start from scratch and wasn't for 80 years. Some ignore this too often in my opinion and then are surprised that the model does not work elsewhere, e.g. in the middle and not so middle east.
At the risk of taking this thread further on a tangent, this is an extraordinarily simplistic analysis. It seems clear that human societies in all their forms are complex dynamical systems.

It's impossible, IMO, to boil down the success of democracy like this.
 
  • #761
PeroK said:
It's impossible, IMO, to boil down the success of democracy like this.
Surprisingly, I agree. However, it is equally too simplistic to ignore the effects of populism on societies. I'm sure the Russians dreamt of and had been promised a Western life in 1991. What they got instead was another system creeping silently into another oppression, which only recently revealed its full consequences. E.g. DW, BBC, and FB have been forbidden not earlier than these days.
 
  • #763
Transnistria already followed Donbas and Luhansk. There are Russian troops already in. At least they have a river as a new border. And it is easier. The whole country splits into two parts anyway: one part is Russian, the other part is Romanian.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes artis
  • #765
This has done a good job of splitting the world between "haves" and "have nots". The former are the countries with sanctions. Is this a coincidence, or someone's plan?
 
  • #766
Keith_McClary said:
This has done a good job of splitting the world between "haves" and "have nots". The former are the countries with sanctions. Is this a coincidence, or someone's plan?
Where do China and India, with 40% of the world population between them, fit into that model? Is China a "have" or "have not"?
 
  • #767
PeroK said:
Where do China and India, with 40% of the world population between them, fit into that model? Is China a "have" or "have not"?
In 2011 China was in the bottom half:
imfchart.png

Reminds me of:
Russophrenia - a condition where the sufferer believes Russia is both about to collapse, and take over the world.
Bryan MacDonald
 
  • #768
Keith_McClary said:
In 2011 China was in the bottom half:
View attachment 297888
I guess that makes China a "have not"?
 
  • #769
As of now, 3% of the entire Ukrainian population has already left the country, and no end is in sight. I have never seen so many little children on one spot as in the news these days. The children's hospital in Kyiv that is currently operating in the basement has sent many to Germany, but many cannot be transported. They die under the hands of the surgeons and nurses. Also, orphans and handicapped children arrived here.

It is these pictures that make me angry. One bullet, we only need one bullet.
 
  • Sad
Likes Astronuc and dlgoff
  • #770
fresh_42 said:
As of now, 3% of the entire Ukrainian population has already left the country, and no end is in sight.
Wow. That's a lot.
 
Back
Top