- #736
- 27,917
- 19,408
If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.fresh_42 said:We are already in a position to hope for someone to stop Putin. Russia isn't the problem, a wanna-be-Czar is.
If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.fresh_42 said:We are already in a position to hope for someone to stop Putin. Russia isn't the problem, a wanna-be-Czar is.
In a dictatorship (false democracy) that's not so simple.PeroK said:If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
Read Gary Kasparov's book "Winter is Coming" and you'll understand how the west contributed to the rise and rise of Mr Putin. The ex world chess champion is as far-sighted politically as ever he was over the chessboard!PeroK said:If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
He wasn't appointed by a foreign power or by a military coup.The Russian people voted him in and stood back when political opponents were pushed out. They've done almost nothing to stop the rise of a dictator to a position of absolute power.Rive said:In a dictatorship (false democracy) that's not so simple.
Yes, of course, I forgot. We're to blame. Not the fault of the Russian people at all. Blameless peace-loving citizens of Mother Russia betrayed by the evil citizens of the west, like you and me.neilparker62 said:Read Gary Kasparov's book "Winter is Coming" and you'll understand how the west contributed to the rise and rise of Mr Putin.
It is not that easy. You assume a democracy where there is none.PeroK said:If the Russian people are not responsible for Putin, then I don't know who is.
Oliver Cromwell.PeroK said:He wasn't appointed by a foreign power or by a military coup.The Russian people voted him in and stood back when political opponents were pushed out. They've done almost nothing to stop the rise of a dictator to a position of absolute power.
They had the chance from 1990 to choose democracy and peace with the free world. They choose dictatorship and war with the free world.
Even if Putin goes, who says the Russians won't appoint another dictator to take his place?
How did it come to be so undemocratic? Why has the UK never succumbed to the temptation of a strong, dictator who crushes all opposition. I'll accept it might be luck.fresh_42 said:It is not that easy. You assume a democracy where there is none.
I do not think that sarcasm is a constructive contribution.PeroK said:Yes, of course, I forgot. We're to blame. Not the fault of the Russian people at all. Blameless peace-loving citizens of Mother Russia betrayed by the evil citizens of the west, like you and me.
If you could just get rid of all the world's democracies, what a perfect, peaceful place the Earth would be.
fresh_42 said:It is not that easy. You assume a democracy where there is none.
Neither is self flagellation.fresh_42 said:I do not think that sarcasm is a constructive contribution.
To misquote James Joyce: history is a nightmare from which we should all try to awaken.fresh_42 said:Can we turn back to the subject of this thread. I certainly will not hold a lecture in Russian history.
You can well take the present to observe how a democratically elected president / prime minister / whatever turns into a dictator. Several persons in Europe and nearby are not quite there yet, but they do their best to get there.PeroK said:To misquote James Joyce: history is a nightmare from which we should all try to awaken.
Most of the populace grew up under the Soviet system. There was a small window of opportunity ca. early 1990s, but the hardliners (nationalists) took control over the decade.PeroK said:He wasn't appointed by a foreign power or by a military coup.The Russian people voted him in and stood back when political opponents were pushed out. They've done almost nothing to stop the rise of a dictator to a position of absolute power.
And it wasn't any better before.Astronuc said:Most of the populace grew up under the Soviet system.
You might have thought that would have given them a belly full of dictatorship and made them less likely to succumb than those who couldn't imagine the horrors.Astronuc said:Most of the populace grew up under the Soviet system.
No, of course not, but that is with what the people were familiar. That's what they knew.fresh_42 said:And it wasn't any better before.
One of the facts why returning to democracy in Germany worked after WW II is, that we had it before and democratic movements since the 19th century. It wasn't a start from scratch and wasn't for 80 years. Some ignore this too often in my opinion and then are surprised that the model does not work elsewhere, e.g. in the middle and not so middle east.Astronuc said:No, of course not, but that is what the people had familiarity. That's what they knew.
Exactly , on point. Russia has never had a democracy, those few years in the 90's doesn't count, it was more of a wild west, oligarchs grab all type of moment, while Yeltsin was busy getting drunk. (You can check youtube, he was drunk on visits often even)fresh_42 said:One of the facts why returning to democracy in Germany worked after WW II is, that we had it before and democratic movements since the 19th century. It wasn't a start from scratch and wasn't for 80 years. Some ignore this too often in my opinion and then are surprised that the model does not work elsewhere, e.g. in the middle and not so middle east.
At the risk of taking this thread further on a tangent, this is an extraordinarily simplistic analysis. It seems clear that human societies in all their forms are complex dynamical systems.fresh_42 said:One of the facts why returning to democracy in Germany worked after WW II is, that we had it before and democratic movements since the 19th century. It wasn't a start from scratch and wasn't for 80 years. Some ignore this too often in my opinion and then are surprised that the model does not work elsewhere, e.g. in the middle and not so middle east.
Surprisingly, I agree. However, it is equally too simplistic to ignore the effects of populism on societies. I'm sure the Russians dreamt of and had been promised a Western life in 1991. What they got instead was another system creeping silently into another oppression, which only recently revealed its full consequences. E.g. DW, BBC, and FB have been forbidden not earlier than these days.PeroK said:It's impossible, IMO, to boil down the success of democracy like this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria_Warfresh_42 said:Transnistria already followed Donbas and Luhansk. There are Russian troops already in.
Where do China and India, with 40% of the world population between them, fit into that model? Is China a "have" or "have not"?Keith_McClary said:This has done a good job of splitting the world between "haves" and "have nots". The former are the countries with sanctions. Is this a coincidence, or someone's plan?
In 2011 China was in the bottom half:PeroK said:Where do China and India, with 40% of the world population between them, fit into that model? Is China a "have" or "have not"?
Russophrenia - a condition where the sufferer believes Russia is both about to collapse, and take over the world.
Bryan MacDonald
I guess that makes China a "have not"?Keith_McClary said:In 2011 China was in the bottom half:
View attachment 297888
Wow. That's a lot.fresh_42 said:As of now, 3% of the entire Ukrainian population has already left the country, and no end is in sight.