What is the reality of finding a perfect partner?

  • Thread starter honestrosewater
  • Start date
In summary, Men and women differ in what they are willing to give up in order to have a happy relationship. Men are usually willing to give up some things that are important to them, such as free will, while women are usually willing to give up things that are not important to them, such as friendships with other people.
  • #106
I am reminded of a quote that tribdog made a while back. (I liked it so much it ended up in my myspace) here is is

"Watching Dr. Phil can lead to the harder stuff, Springer, Regis etc. Stuff you REALLY don't want to get into" - Tribdog
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
saltydog said:
Jesus, don't tell them that Eve. You're just making it worst for everyone. And then I bet you complain about men and then wonder why.
Actually I don't complain about men in general because I don't believe in stereotypes, although there are numbers of men and women that fall into certain categories. If I had to choose, I would much rather spend an afternoon with some guy drinking beer and watching football than go shopping and have fake nails applied with some airhead woman, and I would rather sit at home with a good book than do either.

No doubt you'd think a man is a pus*y if he reads any of the books about having good relationships.
Yes. I have to admit that I would be concerned about anyone that reads any type of self help or relationship advice book. I don't want someone that has to learn how to fake a personality.
 
  • #108
Evo said:
If I had to choose, I would much rather spend an afternoon with some guy drinking beer and watching football

I'm afraid you're one out of 200 or so that would rather do that. Don't you think men want women to act like women and not like them? Same goes for guys acting like guys for women I think too. Most women I suspect hate with a passion their guys watching all that football! Ar you kidding me? A frickin' football widdow some of them are.

About the self-help books, might I ask you how do you suppose a man is to learn how to participate in a healthy relationship? He has to learn somehow. It's ain't comin' naturally that's for sure. Most men fail misserably on that front: they walk past the girls playing vollyball in single file leaving their Relationship-101 class. The girls interrupt their vigorous activity. Calm down but do now stop . . . just passing the ball about and do not look at the guys as they walk by . . . they know.
 
  • #109
Cosmo16 said:
I am reminded of a quote that tribdog made a while back. (I liked it so much it ended up in my myspace) here is is
"Watching Dr. Phil can lead to the harder stuff, Springer, Regis etc. Stuff you REALLY don't want to get into" - Tribdog

Dude, that's wrong on so many levels. Yes I watch Dr. Phil. Lots. But I like that sort of stuff. Springer is different although I did watch one last week about the teenage runaways. It's a start, Dr. Phl is and it's helpful if men would only allow themselves the time to understand more about their relationships. Like this one on Dr. Phil yesterday:

The guy just recently married, still kept regular contact with 6 of his girl "friends". This naturally upset his wife but he couldn't understand why she was upset about it because he said "nothing's happin'". Yea right. That should not even be open for discussion. He doesn't understand though. Too bad for them both.
 
  • #110
saltydog said:
Don't you think men want women to act like women and not like them?
I guess it would depend on the man. My definition of being a woman doesn't include gluing bits of plastic onto the ends of my fingers. :-p My definition of a man doesn't include him making grunting noises at the tv.

About the self-help books, might I ask you how do you suppose a man is to learn how to participate in a healthy relationship?
It certainly shouldn't be something he read out of a book. You shouldn't "have" to learn anything about relationships. Either you've met the right person for you, which means that person likes YOU and doesn't want you to be someone you're not, or you've met the WRONG person. Books on relationships are advice on how to force yourself into a relationship with the wrong person. Those books need to be burned and people should get a clue that if they have to make changes in order to be with someone IT'S WRONG. Maybe I should write a book about that. :wink:
 
  • #111
saltydog said:
Don't you think men want women to act like women and not like them? Same goes for guys acting like guys for women I think too. Most women I suspect hate with a passion their guys watching all that football! Ar you kidding me? A frickin' football widdow some of them are.
Seems most PFers sit at the PC browsing and posting on PF. :rolleyes: :biggrin:

I would prefer reading a good book than sitting watching sports. And I'd prefer to play sports - I don't like being on the side line. I prefer to be outdoors, and gardening keeps me occupied in spring and summer.

saltydog said:
About the self-help books, might I ask you how do you suppose a man is to learn how to participate in a healthy relationship? He has to learn somehow. It's ain't comin' naturally that's for sure. Most men fail misserably on that front: . . . .
Learn by doing. I think being married for almost 24 years is a pretty good qualification. :biggrin:

I learned from my parents and grandparents mostly. Plus I started young.

My best friend in kindergarden was a girl.

I had a girlfriend (who was my fairy-princess, and I was her knight-prince) in first grade. I still have pictures from the dance we went to. I was probably the only boy who was thrilled to be with his girl. :biggrin:

I moved a lot, so I had a series of girlfriends up until puberty, then I started looking for the 'right' woman.
 
Last edited:
  • #112
saltydog said:
The guy just recently married, still kept regular contact with 6 of his girl "friends". This naturally upset his wife but he couldn't understand why she was upset about it because he said "nothing's happin'". Yea right. That should not even be open for discussion. He doesn't understand though. Too bad for them both.
If these women really are just friends, then it's the woman's problem, not his. She needs to either accept them or leave him. If he's lying and they're fooling around, then she has a right to leave him. That would make him a lier and a cheater and those types don't ever really change, they just try harder to cover their tracks or live in constant turmoil over wanting to cheat and being afraid of getting caught. It doesn't make for a healthy relationship. You can't make an unhealthy, wrong relationship healthy or right, all you can do is try to temporarily cover up the behavior.

There is a LOT of money in deceiving people into believing that bad relationships are normal and that they can be made healthy with some "coaching". PUHLEASE.
 
  • #113
motai said:
I think the problem is that people are going into relationships with unconscious expectations.

For instance, the classical question "Is this guy/girl the right one for me?". Its an entirely self-centered question. Personally, I would be asking "Am I the right guy/girl for him/her".

That and the couple should be able to talk about anything and everything at a certain level, i.e. nothing should be kept a secret. Relationships crumble under dishonesty, or even worse, infidelity, but that's another story.

About the religion thing, personally I think it is important to have the same religious beliefs shared by the couple. A pairing between an athiest and a truly devout Christian will not work at all.

Once a woman has blown 1 or 2 or 5 kids out her *special spot* the rest is herstory. Its up to the man to have the patience and tolerance and to be supportive in the next trying years of parenthood... or not. The woman's patience and tolerance is spent putting up with the infant, toddler, nursing and *doo doo boo boos* and post-partum depression etc... etc... etc...

A man really doesn't know how a woman will react to child bearing etc until it happens... or , as I mentioned 37 pages ago(yesterday!) he can see how the woman's mother delt with child rearing and see how bent out of shape or remarkably in shape the mother has kept herself. This information can be extrapolated on to how the woman he is interested in mating with will deal with birth/life/stuff in the future.
 
  • #114
quantumcarl said:
Once a woman has blown 1 or 2 or 5 kids out her *special spot* the rest is herstory.
:smile: You have a way of putting things so...delicately.

Its up to the man to have the patience and tolerance and to be supportive in the next trying years of parenthood... or not. The woman's patience and tolerance is spent putting up with the infant, toddler, nursing and *doo doo boo boos* and post-partum depression etc... etc... etc...
Having children has to be one of the greatest strains on a marriage, although it can also be greatly rewarding. If I was to suggest anything to a couple considering getting married and having kids is to first thoroughly understand the other person's parenting style and beliefs and walk away from the relationship if you insist on having children and hold completely opposing views. It will only lead to unhappiness for everyone. You cannot create a healthy environment for children (or your relationship) if your ways of handling children are in complete conflict.

A man really doesn't know how a woman will react to child bearing etc until it happens... or , as I mentioned 37 pages ago(yesterday!) he can see how the woman's mother delt with child rearing and see how bent out of shape or remarkably in shape the mother has kept herself. This information can be extrapolated on to how the woman he is interested in mating with will deal with birth/life/stuff in the future.
That's not a bad suggestion, except sometimes the acorn does fall far from the tree. You need to understand how your girlfriend reacts to and feels about her mother's parenting and personal styles. Your girlfriend might be the polar opposite of everything her mother is. My older daughter and I are extremely different, she's more like her father, although she is starting to lighten up.
 
  • #115
Its up to the man to have the patience and tolerance and to be supportive in the next trying years of parenthood... or not. The woman's patience and tolerance is spent putting up with the infant, toddler, nursing and *doo doo boo boos* and post-partum depression etc... etc... etc...
Or not !? If a man can't deal with parenthood, then he better not get the woman pregnant, i.e. don't become a father.

Parenting is a shared responsibility.

I never felt like I was putting up with or tolerating my children. I love and adore my children. Being with my wife when she gave birth, and holding my daughter and son for the first time were perhaps the most profound experiences of my life.
 
  • #116
Evo said:
That's not a bad suggestion, except sometimes the acorn does fall far from the tree. You need to understand how your girlfriend reacts to and feels about her mother's parenting and personal styles. Your girlfriend might be the polar opposite of everything her mother is. My older daughter and I are extremely different, she's more like her father, although she is starting to lighten up.

You're right to notice how a daughter can initially differ from the style of her mother's interaction with life. However... there seems to be some sort of automatic kick-in of the roles and role models that were learned ... perhaps unconsciously (or unawares as the neuropsych people say) once strenuous situations begin to emerge in a person's life.

Even the act of marrage can trigger these hidden role models... and I've seen it myself. So, the rigors of birth and raising a child can double the chances of a woman (or man) reverting and leaning on old role models and behaviours they learned from their parents while growing up.

There there are all the variables like the 10s of thousands of people in Indonesia and Sri Lanka who have no parents or role models... other than the buzzards or the religiousities or the "savior complexed" people who prey, pray and actually try to help out.

I'm suprised to find out you have a daughter. Your photo looks like you're about 19 and your writing is fresh and thoughtful like a 24 year old's.
:smile: You are by all means being a good mother... by my calculations.

The disparity between parenting styles is amazing. You know what i a mean. Some see it as a struggle (ref: my thread "life a struggle?") and some see it as a great opportunity and challenge.

You also said something about deciding if your prospective mate has similar values when it comes to parenting. The proof is in the pudding. And that's unfortunate... because by the time you have children this is when you will be able to assess the mate's true values with regard to the topic.

Its like some guy going on about how well he skis and snowboards... he's the best loves the sport etc...

Then you get him on the mountain and he's a total whiner who hits every tree in sight and totally demands your attention all day.:zzz:
 
  • #117
quantumcarl said:
You're right to notice how a daughter can initially differ from the style of her mother's interaction with life. However... there seems to be some sort of automatic kick-in of the roles and role models that were learned ... perhaps unconsciously (or unawares as the neuropsych people say) once strenuous situations begin to emerge in a person's life.
I notice that I raised my kids just like my mom.

Even the act of marrage can trigger these hidden role models... and I've seen it myself. So, the rigors of birth and raising a child can double the chances of a woman (or man) reverting and leaning on old role models and behaviours they learned from their parents while growing up.
True, it's what you know and it would be like going on auto pilot.

I'm suprised to find out you have a daughter. Your photo looks like you're about 19 and your writing is fresh and thoughtful like a 24 year old's.
You wouldn't believe how old I am in that picture. (shut up Russ ) I stopped maturing when I was 25, so you're about right. :-p

You are by all means being a good mother... by my calculations.
That's what my kids say. They're still young, they may turn on me one day. :frown:

The disparity between parenting styles is amazing. You know what i a mean. Some see it as a struggle (ref: my thread "life a struggle?") and some see it as a great opportunity and challenge.
You also said something about deciding if your prospective mate has similar values when it comes to parenting. The proof is in the pudding. And that's unfortunate... because by the time you have children this is when you will be able to assess the mate's true values with regard to the topic.
Its like some guy going on about how well he skis and snowboards... he's the best loves the sport etc...
Then you get him on the mountain and he's a total whiner who hits every tree in sight and totally demands your attention all day.:zzz:
Yep, my ex "had to have kids". My mother would babysit until I got home. My ex would get home before me, but wouldn't get close to the baby. One day my mom was sick, so when he got home from work, she left. I got home about 2 hours later and found him on the nursery room floor in a fetal position crying and repeating over and over 'I didn't mean to do it". I kept asking him what, but he was incoherent. Then I panicked, thinking he'd killed the baby. I rushed to the crib and checked and she was sleeping peacefully.

When I finally got him to snap out, he started screaming "DON'T YOU EVER DO THAT TO ME AGAIN", over and over. Later when he had calmed down he said the baby was crying, and he had yelled at her, which caused him to go into the fetal/crying thing, then the anger that he had been unexpectedly left alone with the baby for two hours was my fault and some sort of evil conspiracy against him.

Uhm, yeah, you don't know how people will cope with children. :bugeye:
 
  • #118
saltydog said:
Dude, that's wrong on so many levels. Yes I watch Dr. Phil. Lots. But I like that sort of stuff. Springer is different although I did watch one last week about the teenage runaways. It's a start, Dr. Phl is and it's helpful if men would only allow themselves the time to understand more about their relationships. Like this one on Dr. Phil yesterday:
Don't you worry about beer cans falling on your head?
 
  • #119
quantumcarl said:
Once a woman has blown 1 or 2 or 5 kids out her *special spot* the rest is herstory. Its up to the man to have the patience and tolerance and to be supportive in the next trying years of parenthood... or not. The woman's patience and tolerance is spent putting up with the infant, toddler, nursing and *doo doo boo boos* and post-partum depression etc... etc... etc...
A man really doesn't know how a woman will react to child bearing etc until it happens... or , as I mentioned 37 pages ago(yesterday!) he can see how the woman's mother delt with child rearing and see how bent out of shape or remarkably in shape the mother has kept herself. This information can be extrapolated on to how the woman he is interested in mating with will deal with birth/life/stuff in the future.
What makes you think the man's biggest problem will be watching his wife raise the kids?

I used to feel like I was coaching about 10,000 soccer teams (never volunteer - once they've found a sucker, they never let up).

The talk about religious differences reminded me of our family. My wife's Catholic. I'm not. I'm the one that usually took the kids to church. (That sounds unfair, but, actually, I just find it very relaxing and the sermons always provoke a lot of thought. If it wasn't for the 'details', I'd probably join.)

Our kids were bottle fed, so I was even the one who had to get up for all of those middle of the night feedings. Again, that's actually something I always found very relaxing. I had our first sleeping all night after just two weeks - it got a little longer for each one as you began to realize just how short the first few weeks are. Eventually it evolved to "they'll sleep all night long when the time it takes to wake me up exceeds the amount of time and effort they're willing to put into crying" (around 6 weeks).
 
  • #120
New issues keep getting brought up like crazy in this thread! I can barely keep up!

Okay, on being like your parents, not always a good rule of thumb. My sister is a bit like our aunt in her personality and temperament in terms of not thinking things through or planning ahead, making frivolous purchases, going for the whole get your hair and nails done thing, and flying off the handle for fairly minor things. I don't know who I take after...my father a bit, one of my grandmothers a bit, and probably a healthy dose of both grandfathers. As my father and one set of grandparents has already passed away, you're not going to learn much from observing them about what I'm like. My mom and I tend to be polar opposites. She's someone who revels in gossip while swearing up and down she can't stand gossip, she cannot keep a secret for her life (if I want to quickly and efficiently share news with the entire family, I just have to tell my mom), and she gets ridiculously worked up over really minor things...everything is stressful if you take her word on it. My step-dad and I have a running joke when she starts going off and blowing up some insignificant issue...he gives me a look of exasperation and says, "She's your mom." I reply with, "It's not my fault. I was born with her; you actually chose her, and I tried warning you."

Of course, there were some things my mom did right in raising me, obviously :approve: :biggrin:, but a lot of things that I turned out okay in spite of. I do have pretty strong opinions about how children should be raised (is there anything I don't have strong opinions about?), so, yeah, finding someone with compatible views on that is important to me. Everyone will bring their own views and approaches to child-rearing, and it doesn't hurt to have alternative approaches if one way doesn't work, as long as they aren't completely incompatible.

As for knowing how someone will cope with children, that's where observation can help. When you attend family functions or other gatherings where children are present, does the person you're dating avoid the children, complain about all the screaming, look like someone just handed him nuclear waste if they ask him to hold a baby, start gagging if the diaper is dirty, etc.? If so, he's probably not going to be a lot of help with a baby, or is going to need a lot of coaching before he's comfortable with it. On the other hand, if he's just awkward when handed a baby, but tries cooing at it, or reads stories to the children, or just doesn't shun any room with children in it, he'll probably be okay. And some people are just naturals with babies...or maybe they just started out being around babies a lot when they were young...maybe in a large family with lots of siblings, or younger cousins, or their mom babysat, so they already know how to put a diaper on right-side-up, and can get a wriggling baby into a onesie...or they actually know what a onesie is.

Me, I love infants and older children, but don't know what to do with a 2-year old...that's when they're at that stage where they're fully mobile, have definite opinions of what they want and don't want, but lack the verbal skills to tell you that. That's also the age where they want to play the same game for hours and hours and hours and hours, until any sane adult is going to crack if the kid doesn't take a nap really soon...and of course it's the age when they don't want to take naps even if they really need one. :rolleyes: But, all the good daddies I've seen seem to do really well with children at that age, so that'll probably work out fine.

On Dr. Phil and self-help books. I think Evo said it already, if you have to learn it from the book, you've got far too many problems for me to want to deal with. Developing relationship skills is something you should learn your entire life, through your social interactions with others, including parents, siblings, classmates, teachers, other friends and relatives, eventually co-workers, and from observing the relationships around you that work and don't work, as well as through dating. It's rare for someone to marry the first person they start dating. Dating is also practicing being in relationships. It helps you find what you like and don't like about potential partners, as well as gives you opportunities to learn from your blunders for when you meet the next person.

As for that example given above of the guy with 6 female friends, I agree with Evo, it's the wife's problem. She's obviously insecure about the relationship and jealous. Her husband shouldn't have to give up his friends to be married to her, that's just nuts. If she has a legitimate reason to suspect infidelity, then she should just dump his sorry butt, not sit around moping because he has female friends. He should probably just leave her, because she's too psycho to have a normal relationship if she suspects he's being unfaithful with any woman he's friends with.
 
  • #121
saltydog said:
I'm afraid you're one out of 200 or so that would rather do that. Don't you think men want women to act like women and not like them?
Are you kidding? I dislike sports, but I really would rather sit and watch a game and drink beer (the more beer you drink, the easier it is to watch the game, by the way) than sit around having some twit poke at my cuticles with a stick or gas me with hairspray. I've never had anyone question whether I act like a woman, I just don't need to cover myself in paint to show it. It's interesting when I hear from my married male friends and they tell me what movie they went to see or rented on the weekend or some such thing, and follow it with "not my choice, obviously." I end up wondering if they ever get to see a movie they would choose or like. Somehow, it seems to me it would be a bonus to meet someone with shared tastes in things like that so you could enjoy being with your spouse AND enjoy the movie too, not choose one or the other (one guy I know ends up going to the movies alone to see what he enjoys because he wife won't join him, even though he goes along to see the "chick flicks" she likes). I don't even attempt to understand anymore. As far as I can tell, the only reason they stay married is they're both from families that are too strongly Catholic to get a divorce without being considered an embarrassment to the family.
 
  • #122
i just have to say that compared to you guys, I'm some weird gal. I love manicures and especially pedicures! the fake nails are too much, (i got them once and cut them right away so i could play guitar...) but its fun getting all pretty and dolled up! course i love football, so i never mind watching the games, but usually i watch on the little tv in the kitchen while making snacks and stuff, but i like to cook, so that's cool too...
 
  • #123
The_Professional said:
you know, guys are thinking along the same lines..
Guys think?

Yeah, I haven't read the rest yet. I just wanted to say that I'm better. I didn't actually change or figure anything out. I was just able to stop worrying so much about other people's expectations. Well, so I guess other than that, I didn't change or figure anything out. Heh. Anywho, I think everyone should try it if they haven't already. I don't mean not worrying about people's expectations and such to the point of being inconsiderate; I just mean not letting yourself feel imprisoned by them. Ah, I don't even know how I got in, but getting out is so exhilarating! :cool: I'm finally back to being myself again. (For better or for worse... :biggrin:)
Okay, so I have to say this too. I love being alone. And I love good people. Good people being happy literally makes me happy. And when I can make good people happy, it makes me even happier. And when other good people and I have our, whatever, circumstances and characteristics all aligned or whatever in such a way that allows us to spend time together doing things that make us happy and making each other happy, it makes me, well, even happier still. It's so great. Everyone should try it. Okay, I think I'm done now. Heh.

So what's really wrong with men? For starters, I think it might be being shoved into a category like that...
 
Last edited:
  • #124
honestrosewater said:
So what's really wrong with men?
Television.

If you didn't have television, you wouldn't have talk shows with Oprah Winfrey or Dr. Phil and women wouldn't even think to ask what's wrong with men. That would also mean men couldn't spend all weekend watching football on TV. You also wouldn't have beer commercials.
 
  • #125
BobG said:
Television.
If you didn't have television, you wouldn't have talk shows with Oprah Winfrey or Dr. Phil and women wouldn't even think to ask what's wrong with men. That would also mean men couldn't spend all weekend watching football on TV. You also wouldn't have beer commercials.

well said, i too think TV should be blamed.
 
  • #126
BobG said:
Television.
If you didn't have television, you wouldn't have talk shows with Oprah Winfrey or Dr. Phil and women wouldn't even think to ask what's wrong with men. That would also mean men couldn't spend all weekend watching football on TV. You also wouldn't have beer commercials.
What?! I'm a man?!? Wow, that explains a lot.

Or not...
 
  • #127
honestrosewater said:
What?! I'm a man?!? Wow, that explains a lot.

Or not...
I didn't say "you're a man". I said "television". They don't even sound the same.

It just goes to show you - it's impossible to communicate with women. :rolleyes:
 
  • #128
BobG said:
Television.
If you didn't have television, you wouldn't have talk shows with Oprah Winfrey or Dr. Phil and women wouldn't even think to ask what's wrong with men. That would also mean men couldn't spend all weekend watching football on TV. You also wouldn't have beer commercials.
Wow, that really seems to sum it all up! Televisions must be banned! :biggrin:
 
  • #129
Moonbear said:
Wow, that really seems to sum it all up! Televisions must be banned! :biggrin:
You two work for a radio company, don't you?

Oh, speaking of beer commercials, you know those Malibu Rum commercials with the Caribbean people? Haha, I love those. They're hilarious. I'll see if I can find them somewhere.
Yeah, they're at their website (to enter, you must be legal drinking age, or at least tell them you are :rolleyes:). Check 'em out. Funny stuff. http://www.malibu-rum.com/

Oh, man, it's total gridlock! :smile: :smile:

I want that fish! :smile: :smile:

I just want to buy a melon. :smile: :smile:

Is your mother proud of you? :smile: :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #130
Ah, so there is nothing actually wrong with men. The problem is that women were watching television instead of reading the http://orefa.com/misc/men_rules.html" . :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #131
I find this thread insulting and degrading. I just wanted you to know that.
 
  • #132
franznietzsche said:
I find this thread insulting and degrading. I just wanted you to know that.
...and you read it all the way to page nine! :rolleyes:

I think most of it is pretty funny.
 
  • #133
Orefa said:
...and you read it all the way to page nine! :rolleyes:
I think most of it is pretty funny.

no, i read the first page, and the last page.
 
  • #135
Yeah, but franznietzsche forgot to mention that being insulted and degraded turns him on. (Freak.)
 
  • #136
Has anyone found me a young penguinish girl yet?
 
  • #137
Pengwuino said:
Has anyone found me a young penguinish girl yet?
Hey, my restraining order expires this weekend. :wink:

(If that line works, I am a god.)
 
  • #138
honestrosewater said:
Hey, my restraining order expires this weekend. :wink:
(If that line works, I am a god.)

Mine expired last friday :!) :!) :!) :!)
 
  • #139
honestrosewater said:
Guys think?

and your point is?
 
  • #140
Moonbear said:
. . . (the more beer you drink, the easier it is to watch the game, by the way) . . . .
I thought you were going to say that the more beer, the better the guy looks. :smile: :smile: :smile:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top